Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

SWFImportFreetype.cpp isn't used anymore the font import code is in swft/swft_import_ttf.cpp. I did some work on the font import some time ago, but didn't commit the results yet. I think I finished almost all the lowlevel stuff (xml->swf and back) for the DefineFont3 and DefineFontAlignZones (incor

Re: [swfmill] Does swfmill have any options for image compression?

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, mawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think these are jpeg artifacts, though really strong ones. > > Check it out here: > http://typeofundefined.com/stuff/screens/swf_png_low.png Oh, yes. That's /not/ lossless. So, I guess the answer is to use JPGs when you want b

Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

Hello Mark, thanks for the pointers, I think we will look into the code anyway. Will update the community about the results of course. I don't think we need 100% similarity, we just need to improve the look'n'feel a bit - currently, CS one seems a lot better in some cases, and it'd be n

Re: [swfmill] Does swfmill have any options for image compression?

Mark Winterhalder schrieb: >> Tested it at work, with a 24 bit PNG with semi-transparent areas, saved for >> web out of Photoshop: >> >> - Original PNG: 858 KB >> - SWF output size, with JPEG quality for publishing set to 0 (zero): 177 KB >> - SWF output size, JPEG quality set to 100 (hundre

Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

Hi Mike, As far as I know, Swfmill only supports DefineFont2, not DefineFont3 as it is used in SWF9 (or 8?). DefineFont3 would be needed to take advantage of the better font rendering settings. I might miss something, so please Dan or Ralf correct me, but it seems the places to look for are:

Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

Hello Mark, MW> How about the official specs, which just had the restrictions removed MW> a few days ago? :) MW> I was going to use these ones, but I think Ralf can shade some light on - what is currently supported in swfmill - what is missing - where to loo

Re: [swfmill] Does swfmill have any options for image compression?

> Tested it at work, with a 24 bit PNG with semi-transparent areas, saved for > web out of Photoshop: > > - Original PNG: 858 KB > - SWF output size, with JPEG quality for publishing set to 0 (zero): 177 KB > - SWF output size, JPEG quality set to 100 (hundred): 627 KB > > The low quality ver

Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Michael Pliskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you can point us to some docs/info on these extra new font > features? We can try adding support ourselves then... How about the official specs, which just had the restrictions removed a few days ago? :)

Re: [swfmill] Embedded fonts looks dfferent for flash8 and flash9 and different from Flash CS application

Hello Ralf, RF> This problem is caused by the missing support for the new font features RF> that were introduced in flash 8. I'm not sure if I have time to RF> implement any of this in the near feature. RF> Please send me the generated swf files. Are you able to create a flash 7 RF> version of the