Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

Sorry, this fell off my radar. I’ll test and merge again. - Tony > On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Luke Howard wrote: > > BTW is anything blocking integrating SR-2416? > > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/574 >

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

Thanks, SR closed. > On 28 Oct 2016, at 3:06 AM, Tony Parker wrote: > > Sorry, this fell off my radar. I’ll test and merge again. > > - Tony > >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Luke Howard > > wrote: >> >> BTW is anything

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

BTW is anything blocking integrating SR-2416? https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/574 That allows value types to be archived too if they support _ObjectBridgeable (they’ll come back as reference types though). > On 27 Oct 2016, at 4:22 AM, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

> On Oct 26, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Max Desiatov wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > This is very interesting caveat. Is there a plan to get this documented > anywhere? I haven't seen any documentation for Swift Foundation published > publicly anywhere akin to how it's done for other

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

Hi Sai, We do have basic support for keyed archiving and unarchiving in swift-corelibs-foundation on Linux. The limitation is that the NSCoding protocol cannot be applied to Swift struct types, only class types. On Darwin, the class also must be a subclass of NSObject. This last limitation may

[swift-corelibs-dev] Query on NSKeyedArchiver

Hi Tony,   From your comments on Pull Request #574 I understand that we cannot archive/un-archive non-NS objects using  NsKeyedArchiver & NSKeyedUnarchiver.I s my understanding correct ..? Does this means that archiving and un-archiving of  swift types is  not supported on Linux  ?   -Sai Hema