On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> And now, swift compiled programs run correctly on FreeBSD!
This is great, thanks Davide!
> % ./swiftc hello.swift -o hello
> davide@rabbit1:/exps/swift/build/Ninja-ReleaseAssert/swift-freebsd-x86_64/bin
> % ./hello
Hi,
Many important tests are XFAIL'ed on Linux. Usually this is because
one or few parts of the test use the Objective-C runtime or rely on
Foundation.
These parts can usually be separated into separate files, or guarded
with `#if _runtime(_ObjC)`. Sometimes these failures are real issues
that
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Dmitri
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> And now, swift compiled programs run correctly on FreeBSD!
>
> This is great, thanks Davide!
>
>> % ./swiftc hello.swift -o hello
>>
Tony, all:
I went back to basics and used the following to build:
./swift/utils/build-script -R --xctest --foundation -t
Unfortunately I get the same result - missing symbols for enumerations in
libFoundation.so. Once again I'm building against the master branch for
all repositories.
I'm
I've got Swift building now on Fedora 23. The only problem issue I'm
running into is probably related to:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23785
CMake Error at scripts/cmake_install.cmake:36 (file):
file INSTALL cannot find
"/build/buildbot_linux/lldb-linux-x86_64/lib/python2.7".
Call
On Dec 11, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Slava Pestov via swift-dev
wrote:
> With your proposal, the fact that the entire tuple payload can be matched by
> a pattern implies that ‘indirect’ has to become a formal type in the
> language, since you will now be able to write down a value
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> On Dec 13, 2015, at 3:34 AM, Davide Italiano via swift-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:52 AM,
I agree with Brent that offering description on Arrays where it "shouldn't be
presented to the user in raw form, ever, so the use case here is debugging” is
misleading. Is there any specific reason for them to offer it? Also, there is a
slightly difference in representation of description and
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 3:34 AM, Davide Italiano via swift-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> And now, swift compiled
I've started working on an extension to support this.
https://github.com/owensd/vscode-swift
Still early in the process. Syntax highlighting is mostly there. I'm going to
start the debugger integration next.
-David
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Piero Sabino via
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Austin Zheng via swift-dev
wrote:
> Apologies if I'm overlooking something basic. I looked through the help for
> both build-script and build-script-impl, and while I found flags to disable
> parts of the prebuilt test suites, it doesn't
12 matches
Mail list logo