> On 14 Oct 2016, at 18:55, Daniel Dunbar via swift-build-dev
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Alexis via swift-evolution
>> mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:01 AM, Ankit Aggarwal via swift-evolution
>>> mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote
Hi,
As noted by others, the standard extension for this file .lock, so I would
prefer to keep that convention.
As I would never want my CI or any random team member to build a different
package to what I've developed and tested already, I will always want
Package.lock to exist. It's much easie
I appreciate that I'm late on this, but I'm on vacation.
> On 29 Jul 2016, at 20:36, Daniel Dunbar via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> Hello Swift community,
>
> The review of "SE-0135: Package Manager Support for Differentiating Packages
> by Swift version" begins now and runs through August
> On 13 May 2016, at 07:22, Vladimir.S via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> It seems like all problems could be solved by allowing line-break instead of
> comma in list:
For what it's worth, I'm very much in favour of this idea of allowing line
breaks instead of commas in lists.
I'm neutral on
> On 10 May 2016, at 16:38, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
>
>> On May 10, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Rob Allen via swift-build-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not totally sold on `swift package` as the new command though as
>> "package" is an imperative verb like "build" or "test" and implies that if I
>> run it
> On 10 May 2016, at 16:38, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
>
>> On May 10, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Rob Allen via swift-build-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not totally sold on `swift package` as the new command though as
>> "package" is an imperative verb like "build" or "test" and implies that if I
>> run i
> On 10 May 2016, at 17:38, Rick Ballard via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> Question for those of you who are advocating for a "spm" alias: Do you have a
> strong argument / preference for "spm" vs "swiftpm"? Personally I have been
> abbreviating the project as "swiftpm" and not "spm" when I ta
> On 10 May 2016, at 10:04, Honza Dvorsky wrote:
>
> I agree with Rob and Ankit, with one detail: I'd expect `spm` to print the
> help section, instead of building (just like npm, nvm, gem, pod etc).
Agreed. We have `swift build` for building.
Regards,
Rob...
_
> On 9 May 2016, at 23:05, Daniel Dunbar via swift-build-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello Swift community,
>
> The review of "SE-0085: Package Manager Command Names" begins now and runs
> through May 12. The proposal is available here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master
