> • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
Good stuff.
How exact does the type match have to be? Can they be two subclasses of a
different superclass? Can they conform to common protocols? Can they conform to
no common protocols and just be `AnyObject` or `Any`?
Is there a way to
+1
This is a great addition. I've hoped for it since 1.0.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>
>
> +1
>
> • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change
Excellent point Brent. I was considering that this would have to be an
exact match, I hadn't considered the need for an (x: Y) syntax.
This probably should be considered in a future proposal though. The future
proposal may make sense to be after existential types are explored, so that
common
