Hi all,
The subject says it all: do you know which providers support TLS (the
technology formerly known as SSL) for SMTP, POP and/or IMAP for their
residential or small-office dialup/broadband customers?
If you are a provider yourself and you do not offer it: Are there
particular reasons? Is it
Hi all,
The subject says it all: do you know which providers support TLS (the
technology formerly known as SSL) for SMTP, POP and/or IMAP for their
residential or small-office dialup/broadband customers?
TLS for SMTP makes no sence since this will only protect your message
enroute from your
Salut,
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:43:09PM +0200, Matthias Leisi wrote:
If you are a provider yourself and you do not offer it: Are there
particular reasons? Is it a conscious decision not to offer it or is it
that just nobody asked yet?
From a cryptographical point of view, this would be a
Hi Tonnerre,
From a cryptographical point of view, this would be a dangerous setup.
You're transmitting the same message encrypted (local MX - Client)
as well as unencrypted (sending MX - local MX). This leaves you
open to a known plaintext attack against your server's private key,
because
Kirill Ponazdyr [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-16:
The subject says it all: do you know which providers support TLS
(the technology formerly known as SSL) for SMTP, POP and/or IMAP for
their residential or small-office dialup/broadband customers?
TLS for SMTP makes no sence since this will
Hi
From a cryptographical point of view, this would be a dangerous setup.
You're transmitting the same message encrypted (local MX - Client) as
well as unencrypted (sending MX - local MX). This leaves you open to
a known plaintext attack against your server's private key, because it
gives
6 matches
Mail list logo
