Hi SwiNOGers,
I'm looking for systems speaking SCTP [1] in order to expose the
experimental SCTP port scanning support for Nmap [2] to some more
real-world testing. If you have network access to systems with
(non-trivial) SCTP-based services, and would be willing to run a
scan for me, then I'd
hi everybody
sorry, i'm quite late sending out the invitation. but most of you should
know it's time for a beer event next monday ,-)
Unfortunately i'm not in Switzerland. Feel free to join me for some beer
in Brussels.
Roman will take over organisation this time.
the facts for the next
Hello!
Quite interesting discussion you have!
Am 26.02.09 11:17 schrieb Andy Davidson unter a...@nosignal.org:
- There seems to be no consensus about how to serve end user
addressing for ipv6
I see some open points which must be addressed in advance before IPv6 could
be delivered to anyone
Salut, Stanislav,
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:14:31 -0800 (PST), Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
What you can fit into 2MB flash is Linux kernel 2.4.x, plus some
very limited number of libraries, daemons and utilities. Also,
even the newest 2.6.x kernel is permanently popping up with ipv6
On 04.03.2009, at 16:05, Beat Rubischon wrote:
Hello!
Quite interesting discussion you have!
Am 26.02.09 11:17 schrieb Andy Davidson unter a...@nosignal.org:
- There seems to be no consensus about how to serve end user
addressing for ipv6
I see some open points which must be addressed
On 04.03.2009, at 22:57, Norbert Bollow wrote:
Andreas Fink af...@list.fink.org wrote:
Currently, we will have a dual standard world for a while. so having
IPv4 server responding with IPv4/Ipv6 information is what we are
going
to see for a long long while. Nobody says you should NOT have
Andreas Fink wrote:
[..]
2nd: IPv6 maps IPv4 addresses into a specific IPv6 prefix. So if you
talk purely IPv6, you can address an IPv4 host by using the ::: prefix.
Wow. Please show me how that works!eleven
As it can't. :::0.0.0.0/96 and ::0.0.0.0/96 for that matter are not
7 matches
Mail list logo
