[swinog] Metanet Root Server

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Kägi
Hi Is there someone from metanet? Please contact me offlist. Cheers Adrian ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

[swinog] Pro / Contra Backup MX?

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Heya Swinog We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to provide a backup MX for their mailserver. Usualy we deny such request, because such a backup MX would bounce all spam which cannot be relayed, and anyway, the sending server usualy queues the email usualy about the

[swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Heya Another one on about the same topic. Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not need any smarthost to deliver email to the

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Backup MX?

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:55:04 +0200 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote: We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to provide a backup MX for their mailserver. Usualy we deny such request, because such a backup MX would bounce all spam which cannot be relayed, and

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:07:58 +0200 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote: Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not need any

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Backup MX?

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2012-05-24 16:55 , Benoit Panizzon wrote: Heya Swinog We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to provide a backup MX for their mailserver. Usualy we deny such request, because such a backup MX would bounce all spam which cannot be relayed, and anyway, the sending

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2012-05-24 17:07 , Benoit Panizzon wrote: Heya Another one on about the same topic. Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Backup MX?

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Fabian Wenk
Hello Benoit On 24.05.2012 16:55, Benoit Panizzon wrote: We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to provide a backup MX for their mailserver. Usualy we deny such request, because such a backup MX would bounce all spam which cannot be relayed, and anyway, the sending server

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Fabian Wenk
Hello Benoit On 24.05.2012 17:07, Benoit Panizzon wrote: Some do not agree. The reasons the tell us are: - It Tech XY has told them that sending via a smarthost is much more reliable. And the customer is loosing the possibility to check on his own, if an e-mail has been delivered or is

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Backup MX?

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Matthias Geiser
Hi Benoit, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:04PM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote: We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to provide a backup MX for their mailserver. I'm not working for an ISP but for company helping to implement business customers to set up their own MX. I