> If you are going to complain about someone, could you at least include
> headers of these spams?
>
> Also, it would be prudent to contact the ISP that the spamvertised
> sites are located.
I'd suggest to post your full spam message in the form on
www.spamcop.net and it will give you all the ab
i would recommend a out of the box solution from a company called Atcom
its a complete small low power box, able to handle up to 8 simultanous
calls.
the box include one FXS and one FXO port.
Asterisk based of course
take a look on http://www.atcom.cn/products_ippbx.html
they even offer good qua
Hi,
We had good results with this Asterisk based solution :
http://askozia.com/
They have appliances based on Alix'es that work well for smaller teams,
interface is clean and easy, very nice ...
Have fun !
- Mail original -
>
>
>
> http://cudatel.com/ is offering a PBX appliance. Th
http://cudatel.com/ is offering a PBX appliance. They are also the main sponsor
of
FreeSWITCH, which is also quite easy to set up and maintain without any
GUI.
I operate two FreeSWITCH VPS'es, and it feels great :)
>
> From: Andre Oppermann
>To: swi...@swi
Kerio Operator is a good solution. Its asterix based but commercial ware with a
nice working GUI. It just works.
Insert CD, have it install on your disk and use a browser to admin it. Have not
seen anything easier. YMMV
On 22.08.2013, at 18:56, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm looking for recommen
Hi,
i'm not really the voice guy, but currently working with
http://www.sipwise.com
and quite impressed. Also the Web Admin GUI is nice and functional. There is
"community edition" for free, downloadable as package or preinstalled VM
(Debian).
If you're environment is growing and you need hig
I'm looking for recommendations on small VoIP PBX systems with these
properties:
- works well with Snom, Aastra, and Soft-phones
- 10-15 phones
- basic admin (web gui) to configure accounts and assign numbers (DDI)
- reliable and secure operation
- support for uplink SIP trunking (no BRI por
On 2013-08-22 11:40, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Do den 22. Aug 2013 um 10:27 schrieb Jeroen Massar:
>> If you are going to complain about someone, could you at least include
>> headers of these spams?
>
> Sure. See below. But I do not have the spam that was going to all
> members of univers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Do den 22. Aug 2013 um 10:27 schrieb Jeroen Massar:
> If you are going to complain about someone, could you at least include
> headers of these spams?
Sure. See below. But I do not have the spam that was going to all
members of university la
On 2013-08-22 11:12, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> slowly I get pissed of from one Belgian spammer.
>
> Do anybody else see high personalized spam from smtp\.ymlp\d*\.net or
> smtp\d*\.ymlpsrv\.net? First I found them in uni zürich where they
> spammed all employees and all students with some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
slowly I get pissed of from one Belgian spammer.
Do anybody else see high personalized spam from smtp\.ymlp\d*\.net or
smtp\d*\.ymlpsrv\.net? First I found them in uni zürich where they
spammed all employees and all students with some festiv
11 matches
Mail list logo