Hi everyone,
I know there is possibly no one around here from T-Mobile US. Maybe
someone has a contact to T-Mobile US that can possibly have a look into
this? I've tried some official e-mail address from whois information
months ago but no response.
We are AS198288 and our prefix 5.34.248.0/21
Hi,
(did not read the whole thread here, so sorry for might saying things
already said before)
Backup MX is a good thing and a good service to offer for business
customers (even there are many different definitions of business
customer in the ISP world :)) with their own mail server. Problem, as
On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Peter Keel wrote:
* on the Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Marco Fretz wrote:
Customer told me that there was a known bug in Plesk. Maybe there
really was a botnet attack against Facebook today :) does anyone
have any specific information? would
looks like its back up:
dig A www.facebook.com
; DiG 9.8.1-RedHat-9.8.1-1.fc15 A www.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3178
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
Good morning everyone,
Does anyone have an idea what happened to Facebook DNS servers? A
www.facebook.com DNS queries are not answered anymore. I'm not sure
but looks like the error exists since about 07:15 today.
on facebookdown.com were a lot of reports from around the world, now
this site is
...
Add this to your host file:
2620:0:1c18:0:face:b00c:0:2 www.facebook.com
Regards,
Vincent
Marco Fretz marco.fr...@gmail.com a écrit :
Good morning everyone,
Does anyone have an idea what happened to Facebook DNS servers? A
www.facebook.com DNS queries are not answered anymore. I'm
On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Philippe Strauss wrote:
yuk must be difficult to get one single dime from a cisco config archiver :-)
more seriously, I prefer a 4 pages code I can comprehend and bend at my taste.
I totally agree. I'm using my own scripts (mostly shell scripts) for config
Hi SwiNOGers,
I started searching the web for a good solution on this task years
ago. There was and is as far I can tell no actual SNMP MIB for
monitoring IPv6 BGP and OSPFv3. The only thing that could be a
solution is this already expired IETF draft
the whole
network monitored and graphed by snmp.
Marco
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
On 2012-02-03 09:29 , Marco Fretz wrote:
Hi SwiNOGers,
I started searching the web for a good solution on this task years
ago. There was and is as far I can tell no actual
welcome a few more ideas and examples of how other ISPs do that...
Thanks
have a nice weekend
Marco
From: Marco Fretz marco.fr...@gmail.com
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] IPv6 BGP unicast peers / OSPFv3
Hallo zusammen,
Danke für die zahlreichen Angebote. Wir haben nun einen Router
gekauft. Falls wir noch mehr brauchen, melde ich mich dann gerne
nochmals.
Schöne Feiertage,
Gruss
Marco
2011/12/12 Marco Fretz marco.fr...@gmail.com:
Hallo zusammen,
Ich bin auf der Suche nach einem günstigen
Hallo zusammen,
Ich bin auf der Suche nach einem günstigen, gebrauchten Cisco 7206VXR mit
NPE-G1 oder G2 oder einem ähnlichen Router, brauche einfach 2-3 x 1GE und
0.5-1GB RAM.
Falls jemand was rumliegen hat und loswerden will, macht mir doch bitte kurz
ein Angebot. Abholung Ostschweiz,
Hi,
kyberna AG is hiring a IT-System-Engineer Network Datacenter
(m/w), Office in Vaduz, Liechtenstein.
http://www.kyberna.com/no_cache/kyberna-allgemein/aktuelles/aktuelles-single-ansicht/article/165/1.html
(German only)
regards
Marco
___
swinog
Hi,
Another thing to defend incoming viruses is to use greylising (what
you should do anyway :-)). Greylisting catches mostly every virus mail
sent out of bot nets (that's where viruses usually come from). We're
using amavisd-new as pre-queue filter with spamassassin and clamAV. we
didn't get any
Hi SwiNOG subscribers,
Hi Swisscom,
As written in SMTP RFCs a mailserver sending to a mailserver should
use port 25 and a client sending to a mailserver (submitting a
composed message) should use submission port 587. So far the approach
in general is a good one, but just the approach, the
Hi SwiNOG subscribers,
Hi Swisscom,
As written in SMTP RFCs a mailserver sending to a mailserver should
use port 25 and a client sending to a mailserver (submitting a
composed message) should use submission port 587. So far the approach
in general is a good one, but just the approach, the
recommend the G.SHDSL.bis or should we stay with G.SHDSL (4096 per line)?
Thanks and best regards
Marco Fretz
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Hi SwiNOGers,
We need an old Cisco router for dial-in access to serve 2-5 users. I
want to use BRI not a PRI interface. 2 lines are enough for these max. 5
customers. solution should serve ISDN and modem users as well.
I don't have much experience with dail-in access routers. Any
suggestions
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Marco,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:41 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote:
What I'm trying to say is: As a mail service provider (recipient
side) you can use greylisting and if there are some buggy mailers
out there in the internet (or in your local network) it's
my opinion is very radical but I think it's the way it should be.
Of course I know there are exceptions with individual customer
situations, etc.
bests
Marco
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Marco,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:21:59 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote:
Of course I know what you mean. That's
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Marco,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:22:39 +0200, Marco wrote:
fully agreed. thats a bad argument against greylisting. if php scripts
or other webserver stuff, like newsletter servers, etc.. use their own
MTA which is most likely a fancy carp script, as you said,
Michael Naef wrote:
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
[..]
Not very problematic for the mail server but of course the PHP
script does _not_ attempt redelivery. And your users go to
gmail, because there they get the mail. Not sure that's
desirable for you.
This whole
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Per,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:41:47 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I am 99% an open source _user_, and I have only written very few
patches. Which proves my point, I think.
So let me summarize. The fact that we all can fix things and only a few
people do it means
7 Oct 2008 um 9:32 hat Marco Fretz geschrieben:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is cool - IRC is a geek tool ,-))
skype is something for warmduscher (well, i've got an account since
2 days...) ,-))
yes, IRC is old-school. it's just great, coding own bots, irc clients,
etc... lot
Database Engine error '80040e57'
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to
add. Try inserting or pasting less data.
/warmduscher_melden.asp, line 125
haha :D
Roger
Am 7 Oct 2008 um 9:32 hat Marco Fretz geschrieben:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is cool - IRC
Boris Meyer wrote:
no one cares about security and I think swinog should care about security!
use IRC, install one of the thousands IRC clients available and ask your
security guru to open the port, or do it on your own ^^
You can connect via SSL for a little bit of enhanced security
Johannes Resch wrote:
On Thu, September 4, 2008 09:52, Marco Fretz wrote:
Sunrise changed their as-communities recently so that's no longer
possible for our backup provider to influence their local-pref.
Where did you get this information from ? Sunrise definitely supports
customer
Scott Weeks wrote:
There're a lot of players in that space. I used to work for a company called
Digital Island that bought Sandpiper to get their Footprint CDN. This was
then sold to CW who then sold it to blah, blah and it finally ended up at
Savvis. There were several lawsuits with
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Marco Fretz wrote:
[..]
... but maybe I'm just crazy and you might simply ignore this post :-)
Most people know *how* to do it (fail-over anycast presto), the
economics, deploying it worldwide and getting a good solid customer base
factor are other factors though
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Guys, are you intending to build a service, or just want to play around?
A service would involve hardware investment, SLA, on-call support staff,
sales personnel, and tons of other investment - are you willing to start
that today?
I just want to know if and how
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Corrected, your wrong. TCP works just fine for short living TCP sessions
(like 99% of all traffic). If you're routing is stable you always end up
at the same site. Only on bgp route changes that influence the path to the
anycast network you may get session drops because
Jeroen Massar wrote:
[..]
Ok, thank you Jeroen and Claudio for this explanations about anycasting.
But is there anyone using anycasts for HTTP content? I think its only
used for DNS, etc... am I wrong?
Wrong. google(anycast http) google(anycast) google(distributed content
system) etc etc
Hi everyone,
I'm preparing my routers for IPv6. Along with v6 support comes the
requirement to secure router management / services for v6.
Currently I've inbound access-lists on all inbound interfaces blocking
management traffic (ssh, telnet, ftp, http, etc.) and things like SIP,
etc. to all
I think it's not worth the discussion in the openbsd list aswell. BSD
(OpenBSD) and Linux are way different, different strategies and goals...
But its just amusing to read.
Marco
julien mabillard wrote:
Well,
I don't know if this needs a comment.
Coding is my preferred way to provide best
hi,
we're not experiencing anything like that here... Do you have any
additional information about the problem?
Marco
Michele Capobianco wrote:
Hey all
A friend just told me that Cybernet told him there is a Switzerlandwide
Internet Problem.
Does anybody know something?
Cheers
to this port
as well - although the rate is much lower than at your site (about
20'000/min).
CU
Tobias
On May 30, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Marco Fretz wrote:
Hi everybody,
is there anyone else expecting massive UDP (mostly port 53) traffic from
67.228.4.81? Destinations are (possibly random
Hi SwiNOGers,
as you know im trying to get ipv6 connectivity for our backbone and
hosting stuff.
Know i got the following question: is it wise to add a v6 host record
for all domains pointing to the webhostings?
www.blah.li.IN A 88.82.97.x
www.blah.li.IN 2a02:380:::x
its not a
i think its possible. just do an lookup. this can also be done if
the user has no ipv6 connectivity...
and Manuel has the skills and time to code such a little plug-in, right? :D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
can you write a firefox plugin which shows a link for each ipv4 website
if
Hi everybody,
is there anyone else expecting massive UDP (mostly port 53) traffic from
67.228.4.81? Destinations are (possibly random chosen) ip address out of
our AS3915.
see attached netflow graph. We've now blocked the ip address and got
over 3.7 million blocks within 10 minutes.
I just
Hi,
Is here anyone who uses the SHDSL / SHDSL.bis technology?
ZyXEL IES1000 - IES5000 DSLAM chasis and SLC1216 - SLC1248-22 line cards?
We have a few problems with lineprobing / rate adaption and crc errors.
Or does anyone know a good paper about Signal-to-Noise Margin
lineprobing / rate
hi
any ideas why i cant find this PoP in the tunnel request form at the
SixXS admin tool? does the pop support ayiya mode? is it free?
greets
marco
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Hi folks,
I would just like to spam here also that, with thanks to the nice folks
from IP-Man, we have setup and now
hi
can anyone post some affected ip addresses or urls please? use
traceroutes instead of ping, so u can see routing problems or changes.
u may use ip-plus (bluewin / swisscom) looking glass services to test
out off bluewin's AS
http://www.ip-plus.ch/tools/looking_glass_servers.en.html
regards
42 matches
Mail list logo
