-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Keel schrieb:
And yes, autoreplies are bad. This also includes out-of-office
notifications. If you allow them out to the Internet at large, you're
almost as bad as the next pill spammer.
Try to explain that to the users at large and
Once again.
It seems uceprotect has some feedback-mechanism, where an email to
a nonexistant address can automatically get the sending server
added to a blacklist. See http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=3s=0
Pity that this also affects addresses which are not existant anymore,
and double
Salut,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:01:38AM +0100, Michael Naef wrote:
*arrrghhh*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host psa1.as8833.net[195.162.162.159]
said: 550 sorry,
no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
This has been a known problem for a long time already:
Dear Claus
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 02:41 +0100, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote:
we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the list with
it's
stupid autoresponder,
so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken now.
Tell me, that you are not really blocking IPs because
Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote:
Perhaps you don't know that i took over the UCEPROTECT-Project in
June 2007, so if you had any problems with UCEPROTECT some
years ago, then you had differences with my predecessor and not with
me.
Many things have changed here since i am responsible for the
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
This has been a known problem for a long time already:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=gpstechnik.chsubmitted=1033063711table=abuse
Sometimes I'm tempted to use rfc-ignorant.org as a blacklist.
I know you won't, but be careful anyway -
Hi all,
we've seen a lot of new users coming from a link which leads to your
discussion about
UCEPROTECT-Blocklists from November 2007.
This is to those that were ranting about our listing policies:
Yes you were promoting us, even if that was not your intention.
First we have to say that
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr bei der Firma GPS
Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732 99 77.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
On Thursday 17. January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Der von ihnen angeschriebene Mitarbeiter arbeitet nicht mehr
bei der Firma GPS Technik AG.
Bitte wenden sie sich an [EMAIL PROTECTED] oder 0041 44 732
99 77.
Hi Firma GPS Technik AG.
***
For your information: You have an autoresponder
Michael Naef wrote:
[..]
Why is it that swinog is the only of the many mailinglist I read
where people are unable to interfere technically correct? The
mailinglist of the swiss NETWOK OPERATORS group? Are we swiss
all plain fools? (This doesn't apply to gpstechnik only)
Because SwiNOG is one
Hi Michael,
we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the list with it's
stupid autoresponder,
so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken now.
http://www.uceprotect.net/de/rblcheck.php?ipr=195.162.162.159
Yours
Claus von Wolfhausen
Hi Jeroen
On Thursday 17. January 2008, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[..]
Because SwiNOG is one of the only lists that forces a
reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As such, stupid vacation programs
who are subscribed will nicely reply to the list and embarras
themselves there instead of only spamming the
*arrrghhh*
I'll rather not try postmaster. It's probably time to go for a
sleep.
This is the mail system at host mxpolicygw2.as8833.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance,
On Thursday 17. January 2008, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Claus
we have Level 1 listed the IP 195.162.162.159 spamming the
list with it's stupid autoresponder,
so if swinog uses UCEPROTECT-Level 1 the loop should be broken
now.
21 matches
Mail list logo
