-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guazzoni Daniele, CH wrote:
ROFL !
Or you force sex sites to use exclusively v6.
Although this would probably lead into some name change: istead of
IPvSix is gonna be IPvSex...
Umm.!! or just move to New Zealand then.. :-)
- -gaurab
Lets keep this brief:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
well, I'm not crazy to develop a new ultimate spam killer from scratch :)
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-12
but those groups don't seem to propose something new either.
Wow, you where able to read the IETF, IRTF
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:27:03PM +, Andy Davidson wrote:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application that
would
push the ipv6 deployment forward.
Errr, more addresses.
Wait until there's no more v4 left. Bang. Killer
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:27:03PM +, Andy Davidson wrote:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application that
would
push the ipv6 deployment forward.
Errr, more addresses.
Wait until there's no more v4 left.
some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application that
would
push the ipv6 deployment forward.
[dreamy mood on]
1. If EU governments would declare that copyrighted content sharing over ipv6
network is
completely legal, then we get immediately a huge demand. It could be
] On Behalf Of Stanislav Sinyagin
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:59 AM
To: swi...@swinog.ch
Subject: [swinog] killer app for IPv6
some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application
that would push the ipv6 deployment forward.
[dreamy mood on]
1. If EU governments would
Guazzoni Daniele, CH wrote:
[see below, you might want to solve your DNS setup, especially the part
of having wrong NS in delegation and in-zone and then having the two
NS's in the same /29 or /24 routed...]
ROFL !
Or you force sex sites to use exclusively v6.
Although this would probably
- Original Message
From: Guazzoni Daniele, CH daniele.guazz...@audatex.ch
ROFL !
Or you force sex sites to use exclusively v6.
Although this would probably lead into some name change: istead of
IPvSix is gonna be IPvSex...
forcing will not work, we all know that. The users
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
forcing will not work, we all know that. The users have to be attracted by
some
new possibilities which they didn't have with ipv4.
Free and completely legal movie downloads and spam-free email could be such
a driver.
How does that work on IPV6
Rainer Duffner wrote:
[..]
How does that work on IPV6 anyway?
I read that RBLs will be dead in IPV6-land, due to the fact that the
address-space can't be packed in a database anymore..
The person who writes that does not realize how much easier it becomes.
RBLs will simply take a scheme of:
Jeroen Massar schrieb:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
[..]
How does that work on IPV6 anyway?
I read that RBLs will be dead in IPV6-land, due to the fact that the
address-space can't be packed in a database anymore..
The person who writes that does not realize how much easier it becomes.
- Original Message
From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
How does that work on IPV6 anyway?
I read that RBLs will be dead in IPV6-land, due to the fact that the
address-space can't be packed in a database anymore..
Currently, RBLs are an important part of our spam-defence.
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
- Original Message
From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
How does that work on IPV6 anyway?
I read that RBLs will be dead in IPV6-land, due to the fact that the
address-space can't be packed in a database anymore..
Currently, RBLs are an
well, I'm not crazy to develop a new ultimate spam killer from scratch :)
but those groups don't seem to propose something new either.
I'm just telling that SMTP is not the right protocol for email delivery:
-- why do client-to-server and server-to-server have to be the same protocol
on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
