Andreas Fink wrote:
[..]
> 2nd: IPv6 maps IPv4 addresses into a specific IPv6 prefix. So if you
> talk purely IPv6, you can address an IPv4 host by using the ::: prefix.
Wow. Please show me how that works!eleven
As it can't. :::0.0.0.0/96 and ::0.0.0.0/96 for that matter are not
a
On 04.03.2009, at 22:57, Norbert Bollow wrote:
Andreas Fink wrote:
Currently, we will have a dual standard world for a while. so having
IPv4 server responding with IPv4/Ipv6 information is what we are
going
to see for a long long while. Nobody says you should NOT have IPv4.
Just not only.
Andreas Fink wrote:
> Currently, we will have a dual standard world for a while. so having
> IPv4 server responding with IPv4/Ipv6 information is what we are going
> to see for a long long while. Nobody says you should NOT have IPv4.
> Just not only. I see the future as IPv4->NAT->limited,
On 04.03.2009, at 16:05, Beat Rubischon wrote:
Hello!
Quite interesting discussion you have!
Am 26.02.09 11:17 schrieb "Andy Davidson" unter :
- There seems to be no consensus about how to serve end user
addressing for ipv6
I see some open points which must be addressed in advance before
Salut, Claudio,
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:15:19 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I would be happy if those HW vendors actually manage to create a
> correctly working DMA engine without stupid limitations but ethernet
> chips seem to be designed by interns.
Well, Brotkomm seams to have fixed the most ser
Salut, Stanislav,
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:14:31 -0800 (PST), Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> > > What you can fit into 2MB flash is Linux kernel 2.4.x, plus some
> > > very limited number of libraries, daemons and utilities. Also,
> > > even the newest 2.6.x kernel is permanently popping up with ipv6
>
Hello!
Quite interesting discussion you have!
Am 26.02.09 11:17 schrieb "Andy Davidson" unter :
> - There seems to be no consensus about how to serve end user
> addressing for ipv6
I see some open points which must be addressed in advance before IPv6 could
be delivered to anyone - not only to
hi everybody
sorry, i'm quite late sending out the invitation. but most of you should
know it's time for a beer event next monday ,-)
Unfortunately i'm not in Switzerland. Feel free to join me for some beer
in Brussels.
Roman will take over organisation this time.
the facts for the next event:
Hi SwiNOGers,
I'm looking for systems speaking SCTP [1] in order to expose the
experimental SCTP port scanning support for Nmap [2] to some more
real-world testing. If you have network access to systems with
(non-trivial) SCTP-based services, and would be willing to run a
scan for me, then I'd be
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> Although it's possible to use FPGA for such operations... which leads to
> another interesting
> project :)
This reminds me of the Liberouter project [1] which does pretty much that.
François
[1] http://www.liberouter.org/about_liberouter.php
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
