Re: [swinog] Anyone from Green here?
We had asked several time green.ch for a delegation for a MPS8 and MPS16 contract - and they denied it. So submitted a list of hosts to be added to their DNS for adding PTRs. No reply, and still only the default PTR entries... Has anything changed in this since the TIC merger? -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc SCHAEFER Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [swinog] Anyone from Green here? On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote: One of my customers has just been told he needs to pay to get a DNS reverse map entry for thei Green ADSL line with fixed IP. Is that really true?? I had a similar query lately, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied that with MPS1 (1 IP address) they won't do it, they will do it only for MPS8 and with a delegation. That's a pity, but it's how marketing works. ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] Has Bluewin a DNS Problem
... This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return one hostname, not 20. ... Well, tend to agree. What about the most stupid wanabe Spam-fighter which are very unhappy as in place (e.g. the third-party service provider systems acting with some SC subsidiaries...) which high rate valid messages if certain brain-dead conditions like PTR not matching MX don't match? If this approach works out, it could be considered. It is not illegal. It's just against what we are used to over the last 20+ years. Just like the A records on second level domain names - depreciated some years ago, tough more and more common. Under the line, it is likely not a DNS issue, but the inability by some mail or AS systems resolving lists. Suspect my servers will fail, too. Xaver, pls send private reply for a test from that system, anytime. Regards, -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Per Jessen Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:26 PM To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Subject: Re: [swinog] Has Bluewin a DNS Problem ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] VDSL/Zyxel P2802 HWL not strong enough for a small company LAN?
Salut Olivier, We are using ZyXEL ZyWALL1050/USG1000/USG300 behind various P-2802. In most case, we have some green.ch public IP address subnet, the P-2802 is running as (br-)router, smaller installations PPPoE is terminated on the ZyWALL. As wholesales VDSL2 is PPPoE only, there is no advantage in terminating the tunnel direct on the router as in the ADSL times using PPPoA then. Please contact me off-list for some more in-depth P-2802 information. Regards, -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Mueller Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [swinog] VDSL/Zyxel P2802 HWL not strong enough for a small company LAN? snip ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] feedback on pppoe needed
There is no PPPoA in Austria AFIAK - aside from some other strange specific things and issues... We are lucky in Switzerland (or say by Swisscom mistake?) to have PPPoA support - indeed. -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [swinog] feedback on pppoe needed why dont you use pppoa? there you get (mostly?) 1500. -steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spiess Bernd Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:45 AM To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Subject: [swinog] feedback on pppoe needed hi swinog members we have the need to rollout a pppoe setup on our dsl colocations where static ip with mtu 1500 is actually in place. as i know many postings around the world regarding pppoe mtu problems and advices to customers to reduce mtu on their clients down to 1492, i wanted to ask for a feedback from you if you all have pppoe with 1500 (=1492) in place or someone uses pppoe with 1508 from cpe to pppoe-server? if you use 1500: are the mentioned problems with websites (eg: gmx) or ipsec setups still an issue ? thanx and best regards from austria to our neighbors bernd spiess / happynet.at / i3b.at ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] Huge retry delays in mail from Sunrise
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: We use the email greylisting policy for incoming email for us and our customers, and it appears that often the email from Sunrise network comes with huge delays, from several hours to several days. Did anyone else see such problems? Guys from Sunrise, plase contact me directly for more details and troubleshooting. Just a guess: The more retries to a certain SMTP destination, the longer the retry interval...leads to exponential delivery times. Pure greylisting is - just like blacklistsing - is useless or leads to unexpected behavior without a well-maintained and monitored whitelist for a corporate or ISP e-mail system. Up to each engineer what he is using for his own private or business server - but this is a different pair of shoes. -Kurt. ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] SDSL
...doing more than 2.3Mbit/s per copper pair is currently not allowed by Swisscom spectrum management Andre, Is this restrction gross or net? What about using e.g. G.SHDSL (which can go to 11 Mbps and more on short copper pairs) or can e.g. G.SHDSL be used if the lines are long enough or limited to these 2.3Mbps? Thank you, -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Oppermann Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 9:42 PM To: swinog@swinog.ch Subject: Re: [swinog] SDSL snip ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
