Re: [swinog] RIPE database and more specific routes

2017-11-20 Diskussionsfäden Bernd Spiess
database and more specific routes Hey! I am updating the route/inetnum objects in the RIPE database and I am wondering if I have to create more specific route objects. For example, I have the following routes announced: - 89.145.160.0/21 - 89.145.160.0/22 (FR7) - 89.145.164.0/23 (DK2

Re: [swinog] RIPE database and more specific routes

2017-11-20 Diskussionsfäden Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:03:18AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > But I am concerned some people may build filters using only exact > matches, so it seems safer to have route objects for more specifics. Generally speaking, you should have route objects for what you intend to announce.

[swinog] RIPE database and more specific routes

2017-11-20 Diskussionsfäden Vincent Bernat
Hey! I am updating the route/inetnum objects in the RIPE database and I am wondering if I have to create more specific route objects. For example, I have the following routes announced: - 89.145.160.0/21 - 89.145.160.0/22 (FR7) - 89.145.164.0/23 (DK2) - 89.145.166.0/23 (GV2) Each more