Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2013-09-26 16:07 , Andreas Fink wrote: > ...or modify your webservers to not deliver web content on such routes > to avoid PRISM and inform the customer about the "shortcut" of his > switzerland to switzerland data over NSA territory... Don't worry about that, they don't need to pull that trick

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Fink
ag von Stephan Wolf > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. September 2013 15:47 > An: swinog > Betreff: Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC > > I have seen things here similar to this very often / permanently: > > cablecom to UK/NL often via level3 and washington inste

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Matias Meier
eundliche Grüsse Matias Meier Online WebToolbox: www.webtoolbox.ch<http://www.webtoolbox.ch/> Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im Auftrag von Stephan Wolf Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. September 2013 15:47 An: swinog Betreff: Re: [swinog] Scenic route

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2013-09-26 15:01 , Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > Am 26.09.2013 12:33, schrieb Jeroen Massar: >>> Anyone else seeing this... do we have a new peering spat or is it >>> just a random routing issue? >> >> Looks to be just that prefix, as for instance: > > Actually we've seen more than 300 prefixes with

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Stephan Wolf
I have seen things here similar to this very often / permanently: cablecom to UK/NL often via level3 and washington instead going directly may something to do with UPC and partnership with level3 - and the "Nonpartners" of level3. "we do not peer with you" politics ?! imho cogent vs level3

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Fredy Kuenzler
Am 26.09.2013 12:33, schrieb Jeroen Massar: >> Anyone else seeing this... do we have a new peering spat or is it >> just a random routing issue? > > Looks to be just that prefix, as for instance: Actually we've seen more than 300 prefixes with the same path. Meanwhile the journey to california an

Re: [swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2013-09-26 11:55 , Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > Anyone else seeing this... do we have a new peering spat or is it just a > random routing issue? Looks to be just that prefix, as for instance: traceroute to chzrh02.sixxs.net (213.144.148.74), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets [..] 3 217-168-54-245.stat

[swinog] Scenic route of the day: L3 towards UPC

2013-09-26 Diskussionsfäden Fredy Kuenzler
Anyone else seeing this... do we have a new peering spat or is it just a random routing issue? Regards, Fredy traceroute to 84.116.204.234 (84.116.204.234), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 r1zlz1.core.init7.net (77.109.136.233) [AS13030] 23.682 ms 23.741 ms 23.775 ms 2 r1zrh1.core.init7.n