On 10 Feb 2004, Robert Meyer wrote:
that's exactly what we are about to implement at the
moment. Unfortunately, it will take some more time,
until we have tasted and set up everything. Besides
what would you suggests for such a small one-purpose
deamon (we are currently examinig Turnaway from
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
| If you don't have enough capacity to do the 5xx errors on the main
| mail servers then setup another (small) machine and redirect (instead
| of blocking) all connections to that box and let it emit 5xx errors.
|
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
| | If you don't have enough capacity to do the 5xx errors on the main
| | mail servers then setup another (small) machine and redirect (instead
| | of blocking) all connections to that box and let it emit 5xx
Robert Meyer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:15:22PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Daniel Lorch wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
| From 217.26.52.23:
| Trying 62.2.95.11...
| Connected to mx.hispeed.ch.
| Escape character is
Hi,
I agree the patch is bullsh** as you call it but I've some mixed feelings
about it. The fact is that I also have some applications that stop working with
this patch but... having username and password in the URL doesn't seem to be a
good idea nowadays.
At the same time, there was some users
hi again
Microsoft has released a IE patch Number 834489. This patch makes URLs like
http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED] unusable. Since we have a few
applications (intranets, closed user groups, a.s.o) running which use this
kind of verification, our customers are running into problems after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
| Please don't start any political (Anti-MS) discussions now. I fully
agree,
| that this MS patch is pure bullshit. I'm very interested in your points of
| view and possible _technical_ solutions in that.
believe it or not - this makes IE more RFC
hi
I was not able to follow the tracks entirely unfortunately I was away for
a couple of days :)
We are experiencing problems sending to hispeed / swissonline. But of course
there have been so many postings about this issue, it is quite hard to find
the right mail in the mailinglist archives now.
Hello Matthias
Matthias Hertzog wrote:
Microsoft has released a IE patch Number 834489. This patch makes URLs like
http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED] unusable. Since we have a few
The Patch is named KB832894 (or Q832894 in the IE Help/About
Internet Explorer Screen), see here:
Dear SwiNOGers,
[AGENDA]
After a long and hard work, we can finally publish the definitive SwiNOG-8
meeting agenda.
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog8/swinog8_agenda-txt.txt
[REGISTRATION]
We're always trying to allow everyone to join the meeting. In the past it
happended once that we had
After a long and hard work, we can finally publish the definitive SwiNOG-8
meeting agenda.
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog8/swinog8_agenda-txt.txt
looks good :)
where is the location? same as last time or back to the kreuz?
We have been discussing about this subject in the past on the
Title: RE: [swinog] SwiNOG #8 update (agenda registration)
Pascal,
I think bigger companies should be able to send all these people as long as there are no other companies not being able to attend because of them.
The amount of people not working in that company shouldn't be your/our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
| You don't have to use NAT for that. There are for more clever
| ways of redirecting.
enlighten me.
daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
i thinks it's more painfull if you deny the coffee to them :))
-steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Daniel Lorch
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] SwiNOG #8 update (agenda
(resend, sorry for duplicates if there are, but it seems that mailinglist
dropped mail?)
-Original Message-
From: Steven Glogger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [swinog] SwiNOG #8 update (agenda registration)
After
Wasn't there a way to fix this in the registry?
The main beef I have with this patch is that it turns
all '@' in the url into 'bad syntax'. Contrary to what
most people think, having a username in the url does NOT
violate any RFCs. 2396 just recommends against passwords
in the URL, but it does
this one also...
-Original Message-
From: Steven Glogger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [swinog] SwiNOG #8 update (agenda registration)
what i forgot: maybe cablecom (as possible sponsor?) could make a short
Hi
i think the user/pwd in the url isn't a good idea. (other ppl on the pc
- ie-history...) i would rewrite (or add an add-in) the website, with
a loggin on it. and with a db, you'll have an nice controll...
Rog
Matthias Hertzog schrieb:
Hi there!
Microsoft has released a IE patch Number
you have one little mistake:
Take:
- Some cold beer (don't be stingy with beer!)
- your whole female work-force
And then:
Send all this to the next BE-Event.
it should be:
Take:
- contact with organisator (or organize one yourself)
- org. will arrange place in best (and for cablecom the
Hi Roger,
sorry if I was unclear--I fully agree with you that,
except in some very exotic circumstances (I can't currently
think of any) web pages shouldn't need this kind of authentication.
You're absolutely correct about being to use other authentication
mechanisms that do not rely on
Hi,
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 01:55, Daniel Lorch wrote:
| http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html
to summarize, and please correct me if I omitted anything:
Preparation
===
- - Send your fingerprint to coordinator. You can retrieve
~ your ID with the following
hi
ok, improved version
1. our fake smtpd server, save as smtpd.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo '220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP'
read input
echo '550 Not today, spam-dude'
exit 0
2. inetd.conf (or use it with daemontools/ucspi-tcp)
1025stream tcp nowait nobody /path/to/smtpd.sh
3.
hi
that's exactly what we are about to implement at the
moment. Unfortunately, it will take some more time,
until we have tasted and set up everything. Besides
what would you suggests for such a small one-purpose
deamon (we are currently examinig Turnaway from
Hi John
Registry-Fix can be downloaded at http://www.mhs.ch/mhsservices/patch.shtml
Matthias
- Original Message -
From: John Morgan Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Microsoft Internet Explorer Patch 834489
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
|How about tcpserver from http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
|
| tcpserver -H 0 25 echo 451 Go away
|
|
| Be careful, not every mail server accepts such an answer in
| the greeting string. You have to provide 5xx answers to
| mail from attempts as
On 10 Feb 2004, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
- - Send your fingerprint to coordinator. You can retrieve
~ your ID with the following command:
Okay, who is now organizing the PGP key signing session?
We have plenty of time left for this until SwiNOG8. I'll post some info
next week after having
Daniel Lorch wrote:
hi
ok, improved version
1. our fake smtpd server, save as smtpd.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo '220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP'
read input
echo '550 Not today, spam-dude'
exit 0
There are many mailservers out there which do not recognize a 550
in the HELO/EHLO
Do big ISP have security systems, which blacklist or return a
SMTP 55x after getting n*1000 mails from the same server?
You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than
a (low) amount of non-existant recipients (which easily happens if
your customer doesn't keep a clean list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
|Okay, who is now organizing the PGP key signing session?
|
|
| We have plenty of time left for this until SwiNOG8. I'll post some info
| next week after having attended http://www.rubin.ch/pgp/kspa/200402/
I would do it, or do you wanna, Oliver?
hi
There's now a company with 11 registered people. I'm not sure the company
itself will appreciate that, but that's not really my/our problem. I just
wanted to point this out and open a discussion about it. On my point of
view, even 5-6 ppl from the same company is ok, not sure about 11. What do
what i forgot: maybe cablecom (as possible sponsor?) could make a short
presenation (5-10minutes?) about their
we-do-put-all-networks-on-blacklist-filter-techniques :)
-steven
-Original Message-
From: Steven Glogger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:54 PM
To:
hi,
There are many mailservers out there which do not recognize a 550
in the HELO/EHLO answer. They will only give up when they get
a 550 on either the MAIL FROM or RCPT TO command.
I think we're getting there. Here is an improved version with just one
caveat: When run through inetd it doesn't
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:01, John Morgan Salomon wrote:
The problem with Mozilla (although I use it under FreeBSD) is
that it can be p***-slow on Windows boxes. Rather use Opera if you
want a nice fast browser (and don't mind non-freeware.) Browser
religious wars, here we go :)
google is
Hi Markus thanks for your feedback!
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Markus Wild wrote:
Do big ISP have security systems, which blacklist or return a
SMTP 55x after getting n*1000 mails from the same server?
You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than
a
Hallo,
Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Not sure where to look for the bug. When executed manually this problem
does not show up. Any bash/inetd-gurus here? :)
Not realy guru, but I have get it to run on OpenBSD3.4/alpha/current,
but I had to change some things. The problem was that
You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than
a (low) amount of non-existant recipients (which easily happens if...
nice concept, should be quite practical against dictionnary
Exactly, this was the prime reason for coming up with it, because I
was just sick of watching
Hi all,
I'm just playing the proxy here: Netcloud (NetworkSecurity Consulting
company based in Winterthur) is looking for two CCIEs.
More details and contact information:
http://www.netcloud.ch/80_jobs/
Nico.
--
Nicolas FISCHBACH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.securite.org/nico/
Senior Manager -
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:48:42PM +0100, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
http://www.reisen.ch/idn/
sorry, currently only german. But interesting topic.
F.
And here the statement from Switch from yesterday about this
issue (see below). I guess three will be many people online
on 1st March at
Wow, thx for the detailled answer! Also working late I see... :)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:33:00PM +0100, Markus Wild wrote:
It's a custom modification to sendmail-8.12.10. My recent conversion
of the previous berkeley-db based approach to a central MySQL db for
storing the records of
There are so many people around (network experts, ISP abuse officiers,
mta/(djb)dns specialists, students, etc): I belive there is the
potential to build something interesting And this could be a good
topic for a Semesterarbeit/Diplomarbeit if there are some
FH/ETH teachers reading...
Q0?4ncTluoc6I8q^?s;n?Ncp2^EM3;]u~d6?l^`w_??;pB*o$i}*(aG]i?W1U0mUwk)6|~J\|6P~al0(`eg6sZMC_u{2hL$C4??J',S[Uw|BA;2%Lw_,AF,hu`j(^?]6??$DX9(hu3S4{1$IL4DBOu.Yl\x5;ikC\rI%?b)LP?u(!
Bz
4_:YT?l}!BHjeX~
?3(?I|
%WRC?mquoy{' ?zi*OZ)Wqxt3s'Ib8|bNu
93axlP2-Ju`FaE;V%rD`$
(nKd`:W~i3G?kXG'o`
`.e??lt9B)aim
A;p
Hello People,
why isn't there a spam/virus filter for those things? Would be a great
idea. ;-)
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 07:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Q04ncTluoc6I8q^s;nNcp2^EM3;]u~d6l^`w_;pB*o$i}*(aG
]iW1U0mUwk)6|~J\|6P~
al0(`
Swisscom bestätigt Probleme mit Splittern und Microfiltern
bei Speed-Update:
Dear BBCS customer
During the past couple of
day's we have had a number issues with ADSL connections not running anymore
after the migration from 600/100 to 1200/200 has been carried out. We are still
As you can see, the speed upgrade doesn't actually *break* the filter/splitter. They
just *assume* that on some lines, where the quality already was marginal before
upgrading, it doesn't work anymore because the filter's/splitter's attenuation is too
high.
This is very different from saying
44 matches
Mail list logo
