On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Matthias Leisi wrote:
I know one Marc Schaefer from alphanet.ch (from Usenet activities, e.g.
CHancelbot).
He is also running debian.ch
Gruss, Matthias
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:21:24AM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
and I can imagine that some carriers will simply shut down all
peerings without MD5.
A DoS induced by rumours? Cool!
Regards, Matthias
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:40:14AM +0100, rudolphi wrote:
so swinogers turn from service-providers in the newspaper's text to
hackers in the headline
That's nothing new. Some time ago you could read in the BLICK that
some israeli hacker broke the A5/1 gsm mobile phone encryption.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
The more and more I get replies of the type:
- Diese Nachrichtenempfänger wurden vom Mail-Server bereits
verarbeitet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fehlgeschlagen; 5.7.0 (anderer oder nicht definierter
Sicherheitsstatus)
from
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:50:38AM +0200, Pascal Gloor wrote:
Indeed, but I manage my network and get internet access. I ask my upstreams
to deliver internet access, and its my job to take care of my customers and
possible harmfull things.
Indeed, but I manage my network and get internet
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:43:47PM +0100, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
what do we now? is this apocalypse?
No, swisstime, the reference clock for all our law enforced traffic
snooping, is realizing that surveillance is a bad idea.
Regards, Matthias
--
Wer bei Word das bekommen will, was er sieht,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:51:56PM +, Daniel Lorch wrote:
9. SWITCH ist gesetzlich verpflichtet, folgende Daten auf dem Internet zu
publizieren:
e. E-Mail-Adresse des Halters;
f. Name, E-Mail-Adresse [..]
Thank you Bakom. Faciliating automated mail-address-crawling,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:36:55PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Pascal Gloor wrote:
I second... but not it comes... shouldnt we, at least, create a SwiNOG
association? So we would probably have a bit more 'power' and people would
perhaps listen us more seriously.. Andre? any comments?
