Hello
Daniel Lorch wrote:
Now's the part I don't quite understand:
4. Because [someone] wants to stop this domain from working,
the DNS servers for this Domain will be attacked (DDoS,
whatever).
I know that RBL servers are quite a popular target among black
hats, but
I don't think, that the bandwith aspect is even worth mentioning... at least
my NetFlow Statistics say so...
I guess, this protection of their DNS servers is not done because of bandwidth
but because of security concerns (as many others before me already mentioned
here).
Cheers,
Viktor
On
Hi there!
Did anyone else also noticed that 164.128.36.34 is no longer responding to
DNS queries from non ip-plus ip-addresses? Maybe, swisscom is trying to save
some bandwidth...
Best wishes,
Matthias
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [swinog] ns1.ip-plus.net
Hi there!
Did anyone else also noticed that 164.128.36.34 is no longer responding to
DNS queries from non ip-plus ip-addresses? Maybe, swisscom is
trying to save
some bandwidth...
Best wishes,
Matthias
EHLO,
Did anyone else also noticed that 164.128.36.34 is no longer
responding to
DNS queries from non ip-plus ip-addresses? Maybe, swisscom is
trying to save
some bandwidth...
They're rather trying to prevent Spammers (and other scum) from abusing their DNS
servers, by disabling
Hi
what'll you do? How do you get the right nameservers or is it time
to write dnsquery after auth?
You don't need to worry about that. Whoever sets up the DHCP server
has to ensure he gives you a working DNS resolver.
Alternative solution? Install a local dns resolver:
, that you've
done everything right.
Matthias
BTW: Would be interesting, how man bandwith they saved with that change.
M.H.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Glogger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: [swinog] ns1.ip-plus.net
hi
