Hello,
top-reply is bad, so I'm reordering
Karim Saouli wrote:
Cheers,
K.
- Original Message - From: Martin Ebnoether
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]
On the Mon, Sep 13
On 15.09.2004 11:40 Guido Roeskens wrote:
Hello,
top-reply is bad, so I'm reordering
but you're doing it as well ;-)
Arnold
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Agree with Daniel.
When replying on a mailing-list, I know, that my answer goes to the list.
Don't change that.
Viktor
On Montag 13 September 2004 23.01, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi
It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should
be able to rely on people being able to
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:19:30AM +0200, Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Agree with Daniel.
When replying on a mailing-list, I know, that my answer goes to the list.
Don't change that.
Viktor
this reply-to fashion is relatively new.
when you want to go private with a participant of a thread and
I've got something nice for ya guys, but let me first find it... must be
somewhere in my 234279304972089347 TeraBytes of mails.. (sounds like a big
garbage eh :-P)
..sshrrssshrr (sound of harddisk grepping...)
ah, got it! here it is (its a bit long, but read it, its quite
8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:19:30AM +0200, Viktor Steinmann wrote:
Agree with Daniel.
When replying on a mailing-list, I know, that my answer goes to
the list.
Don't change
Hello,
A Newsgroup should be wicked !
Cu,
Nico
On the Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Filip Mitev blubbered:
Hi.
Im new on this list, and i ask myself,
why they dont install a forum, where users could list their problem or
questions, etc
Nah. Webforums suck.
We'd rather have a
On 13.09.2004 21:59 Simon Leinen wrote:
So can we finally get rid of the Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] please?
It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should
be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to
all feature when they want to write
Hi
It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should
be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to
all feature when they want to write followups.
1000% ACK ... Don't patronise us!
-1
(I'm lazy, I like it this way)
Daniel
On the Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Filip Mitev blubbered:
Hi.
Im new on this list, and i ask myself,
why they dont install a forum, where users could list their problem or
questions, etc
Nah. Webforums suck.
We'd rather have a Newsgroup or something then.
CU, Venty
--
Es
On 13.09.2004 23:24 Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
We have the reply-to list since ages. About twice a year a meil goes
wrong, and the embarrassment for the sender is punishment enough. I'd
prefer it to leave it as it is, because reply-to-sender causes
interruptions of the discussion.
1. We do this
Ebnoether [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]
On the Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Filip Mitev blubbered:
Hi.
Im new on this list, and i ask myself,
why they dont install
12 matches
Mail list logo
