On 13.09.2004 23:24 Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > We have the reply-to list since ages. About twice a year a meil goes > wrong, and the embarrassment for the sender is punishment enough. I'd > prefer it to leave it as it is, because reply-to-sender causes > interruptions of the discussion. >
1. "We do this since ages" is a killer argument :-( 2. There are loads of mailing-lists which don't use forced reply-to. They all work pretty well. Without interruptions of the discussion :-) 3. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Arnold _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
