Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS1 DNS2 replication lag?

2004-01-21 Thread Alexander Gall
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:19:27 +0100, Didier Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello, this is my first post. to me swinog seems to be a good list to post my question. please correct me if i'm wrong. here's my question: On Monday the TTL for www.juraworld.com has been changed to 1h on

Re: AW: [swinog] Bluewin DNS1 DNS2 replication lag?

2004-01-21 Thread Alexander Gall
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:24:36 +0100, Didier Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi Alex, thanks for your reply. I indeed forgot to mention that the original TTL was 24h. So everything should have been as expected since about yesterday. Yes. In that case, I don't know why the A RR for

[swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Hello We have more and more questions from customers which cannot send emails to swissonline.ch. It seems that since some days swissonline is swissoffline :-) Does someone know why mx.hispeed.ch is down? dig swissonline.ch mx: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;swissonline.ch.IN

[swinog] Swissoffline

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
As an addon to my mail before: I also tried to connect to mx.hispeed.ch port 25 from a machine connected at another provider. This machine will not send any email and is (hopefully) not blocked by swissoffline. So, there must be a general problem with this mx-host. By the way: How can you

R: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Manuel Wenger
telnet mx.hispeed.ch 25 Trying 62.2.95.11... 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:06:27 +0100 -Messaggio originale- Da: Peter Baumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì, 21. gennaio 2004 15:53 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: [swinog]

AW: AW: [swinog] Bluewin DNS1 DNS2 replication lag?

2004-01-21 Thread Didier Leimbach
Hi Alex, Excellent post of yours. I really appreciate your feedback and precise language. But then again, this should come as no surprise from @switch.ch. :) I could verify that dns2.bluewin.ch stops giving me the GTLD (not the root :)) glue, after having been queried for the NS for the

RE: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Oliver Bolliger
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the braindamaged Cablecom Antispam configuration. If you make to many connections to them during a certain amount of time they automatically add a firewall rule to their ipfilter on mx.cablecom.ch. We've run into this problem at least two

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Oliver Bolliger wrote: it would be nice if a cablecom engineer on this list would share some details on how their smtp 'security' is implemented. oliver Hi Oliver At least someone tries to help: Jonas Staempfli wrote: the only idea that i've got is, that you don't have reverse-dns-lookup

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Jonas Staempfli
i'm a very small fish, so i'm sorry that i can't help more. :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/21/04 5:18 PM Oliver Bolliger wrote: it would be nice if a cablecom engineer on this list would share some details on how their smtp 'security' is implemented. oliver Hi Oliver At least someone tries to

RE: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Kurt A. Schumacher
i'm a very small fish, so i'm sorry that i can't help more. :) We will try to rescue you, Nemo ;-) Greetz, -Kurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Staempfli Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Nik Hug
Hello From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the braindamaged Cablecom Antispam configuration. If you make to many connections to them during a certain amount of time they automatically add a firewall rule to their ipfilter on mx.cablecom.ch. We've run into this problem at least two times last

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Oliver Bolliger wrote: we have some servers working (high volume) and some servers not working (rather low volume), all with matching ptr and A records, not known to be blacklisted and so on. personally i think they did some changes to this end of last week - we have been watching some

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Erich Hohermuth
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 17:06, Oliver Bolliger wrote: personally i think they did some changes to this end of last week - we have been watching some @hispeed.ch or @swissonline.ch queues start growing on friday last weeek. I run some tests from our mailservers. The MX to swissonline.ch

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Roger Buchwalder
hmmm... from our cisco (?): router# telnet 62.2.95.11 25 220 mx.hispeed.ch ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:44:48 +0100 ehlo into.ch 250-mx.hispeed.ch Hello tix1.into.ch [194.42.48.59] (may be forged), pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING

RE: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Oliver Bolliger
I got an answer from cablecom hotline. unfortunatley I was out of the office and someone else took the phone. they just told him everything is fine now, we have solved the problem. well, I don't think so :( I am still not able to connect mx.hispeed.ch on tcp/25 from some of our servers. any

RE: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Daniel Kamm
Oliver, from your customer side, I cannot connect to mx.hispeed.ch:25 from a green bb connection. Cheers - Dan On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:06, Oliver Bolliger wrote: I got an answer from cablecom hotline. unfortunatley I was out of the office and someone else took the phone. they just told

Re: R: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Raffael Marty
Well, the first comment about a LoadBalancer to get high-availability is not really a solution: What happens if the router or switch or whatever goes down? So co-locate please! Secondly, what about this: - Transcript of session follows - while talking to mx.hispeed.ch.: DATA 550

RE: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Fabian Uebersax
EHLO, Secondly, what about this: - Transcript of session follows - while talking to mx.hispeed.ch.: DATA 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Fix reverse DNS for 217.118.195.58 or use your ISPs mail server I have a reverse entry for my 217.xxx ... Any clues? Hmm, doesn't

RE: R: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Kurt A. Schumacher
Raffy, $ nslookup 217.118.195.58 Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 *** localhost can't find 217.118.195.58: Non-existent host/domain So let's see: $ nslookup Default Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 set type=soa 195.118.217.in-addr.arpa Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1

Re: R: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Erich Hohermuth
Yet another test ;-) 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Fix reverse DNS for 217.118.195.58 or use your ISPs mail server I have a reverse entry for my 217.xxx ... Any clues? Are you sure ? 1. Check #whois -h whois.ripe.net 195.118.217.in-addr.arpa domain: 195.118.217.in-addr.arpa

[swinog] While talking cablecom: cablecom.biz mails stay in the queues, too...

2004-01-21 Thread Kurt A. Schumacher
Received some business cards from some Cablecom business employees this week, and, after sending a bunch of complaints: ... Recipient #1: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Route=cablecom.biz Error count=22 Last error: %MX-W-NOCONTACT, could not establish contact with any mail servers for

Re: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Adrian Senn
Hi - cablecom applies filters whenever they feel like - no-one gets informed when a filter is added Same for our customer. We (cevinet.ch; hosting service for ymca/ywca switzerland also know as cevi) do forward a lot of mails to the hosting providers in Switzerland. The spam filter remove the

Re: [swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Erich Hohermuth
On Thursday 22 January 2004 00:19, Fabian Uebersax wrote: - cablecom applies filters whenever they feel like - no-one gets informed when a filter is added - the filter will remain active until the admin of the IP / IP range that was filtered contacts cablecom - they do not read mails sent to