Re: [swinog] Provider Class Backbone Routers

2003-02-14 Thread Peter Baumann
Roger Gottsponer wrote: Wow, cool discussions... Voting is ending usually in laws and regulations, control, blaming... Don't think this is what's required here. Please stay with the basics. Agreed? By the way... Sorry that I was the reason for this funny discussions :-) By the way:

[swinog] Swisscom loses last mile

2003-02-26 Thread Peter Baumann
For your information read the article in PC-Tipp: http://www.pctipp.ch/webnews/wn/23398.asp Greetings Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/

[swinog] Threaten with Kassensturz

2003-11-17 Thread Peter Baumann
Hi colleagues We have a customer who is threaten us with kassensturz. We did it wrong that we setup his second choice of email and not his first-choice. My only question is if it is not illegal to argue with kassensturz? Thanks for any answer. Peter

RE: [swinog] Threaten with Kassensturz

2003-11-17 Thread Peter Baumann
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 09:42, Guentensperger, Robert wrote: Hi Peter, I'm not a lawyer. But i meant in K-Tip. I few years ago... But i guess the best way is to think whatever you want and to say the customer is the king. Don't spend too much energy for this kind of customers. Cheers,

[swinog] MX Swissonline Down?

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Hello We have more and more questions from customers which cannot send emails to swissonline.ch. It seems that since some days swissonline is swissoffline :-) Does someone know why mx.hispeed.ch is down? dig swissonline.ch mx: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;swissonline.ch.IN

[swinog] Swissoffline

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
As an addon to my mail before: I also tried to connect to mx.hispeed.ch port 25 from a machine connected at another provider. This machine will not send any email and is (hopefully) not blocked by swissoffline. So, there must be a general problem with this mx-host. By the way: How can you

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Oliver Bolliger wrote: it would be nice if a cablecom engineer on this list would share some details on how their smtp 'security' is implemented. oliver Hi Oliver At least someone tries to help: Jonas Staempfli wrote: the only idea that i've got is, that you don't have reverse-dns-lookup

Re: [swinog] Problems with Cablecom MX

2004-01-21 Thread Peter Baumann
Oliver Bolliger wrote: we have some servers working (high volume) and some servers not working (rather low volume), all with matching ptr and A records, not known to be blacklisted and so on. personally i think they did some changes to this end of last week - we have been watching some

[swinog] Newest insights about the Swissonline MX Problem

2004-01-22 Thread Peter Baumann
I try to do some dns resolving lately: * dig @ns1.sunrise.ch smtp1.flashcable.ch ; DiG 9.2.1 @ns1.sunrise.ch smtp1.flashcable.ch ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41457

[swinog] Cablecom Personal Firewall

2004-01-27 Thread Peter Baumann
again to the support line (human personal firewall?). - Some internal contacts cannot find the right person who knows about the problem. If someone @cablecom is reading this, please contact me on 044/200 00 00, Peter Baumann! Our complete isp-range is blocked to mx.hispeed.ch (81.92.96.0/20

Re: [swinog] Cablecom Personal Firewall

2004-01-27 Thread Peter Baumann
Steven Glogger wrote: hi peter our ranges are also blocked. i already contacted 3 guys at cablecom. they are completely stupid and give only answers like you are not blocked. check reverse etc -steven Hi Steven I figured out now how to contact the techies at cablecom:

Re: [swinog] Cablecom Personal Firewall

2004-01-27 Thread Peter Baumann
Steven Glogger wrote: hi peter i tryed the number 0848 888 300 (number invalid..) yo did you contacted? mister meyer? -steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Fax: +4112779321 Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:

Re: [swinog] New worm is spreading fast...

2004-01-27 Thread Peter Baumann
Kurt A. Schumacher wrote: Full support from our side (once more) - don't hesitate - this is the way to go! Go my friends - but don't forget to document it properly first. There is NO reason using a different SMTP server then the ISP for outgoing mails for this type of connection. Anyone who is

[swinog] Again, Cablecom filtering!

2004-02-05 Thread Peter Baumann
Hello I have again a problem with the strange email cablecom-filtering. We have a customer here which got A NEW IP-RANGE from colt-telecom. This customer cannot connect to mx.hispeed.ch port 25. The customer is now complaining that he cannot send email to swissonline.ch and hispeed.ch, the same

Re: [swinog] Again, Cablecom filtering!

2004-02-05 Thread Peter Baumann
Alexander Koch wrote: On Thu, 5 February 2004 15:08:29 +0100, Erich Hohermuth wrote: Maybe not FQDN ? You would think that whoever posts here does check he is right for sure. What a world view. ;- Skipping these threads by now, this is too much like the NANOG list by now, instead of doing

Re: [swinog] Cablecom customer spammin again

2004-04-19 Thread Peter Baumann
address. I never tried this patch. Any other hints how to do this? Peter Baumann -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/