Full support from our side (once more) - don't hesitate - this is the way to go! Go my friends - but don't forget to document it properly first. There is NO reason using a different SMTP server then the ISP for outgoing mails for this type of connection. Anyone who is really enforced to use a dedicated SMTP server must use a VPN or ssh tunnel anyway. So it is - just like certain hard-wired proxies in place at certain service providers - not a limitation of the "free" connection.
To bad, it will take a while until the last Chinese and Korean ISP has done it, too.
I'm so sorry, John.
-Kurt.
What do you think about this system here? http://spf.pobox.com/
There's a RFC Draft here: http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Here is a live example:
dig aol.com txt
aol.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/24 ip4:205.188.157.0/24 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/24 ip4:64.12.137.0/24 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all"
Peter ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
