Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt because of Spam blocks

2003-10-29 Thread Dani Kamm
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:48, Peter Keel wrote: * on the Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Fermin Sanchez wrote: Hm - pardon my asking, but: What (legal) reason should a dial-up user have to send mail over his own mail server? I don't see the problem in banning *dial-up*-ranges of

Re: [swinog] Routing down Netstream - Cybernet?

2003-07-08 Thread Dani Kamm
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 22:39, Benoit Panizzon wrote: [...] Forget it, it's just the nameserver NS1.WEBSPACE4YOU.CH which is hosted by cybernet that is not reachable at the moment and every other IP I tryed that blocks ICMP :-) In such cases, try tcptraceroute, which uses TCP port 80 to trace

Re: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants

2003-04-02 Thread Dani Kamm
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:20, John Morgan Salomon wrote: You could limit access to people who -are wearing a suit and tie -shaved today -aren't completely wired on caffeine -have slept enough in the last few weeks -aren't wearing a tech or vendor t-shirt So, you only want to deal with

Re: [swinog] Überwachung des E-Mail-Verkehrs ...

2003-04-01 Thread Dani Kamm
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 17:04, Andre Oppermann wrote: [snip] There are indeed discussions going on to institute a registration and identification requirement for all and also 'free' email accounts. Just like the stuff with prepaid mobile accounts. But as long as you can use a free email account