[swinog] Re: [swinog] Whois für microsoft

2004-02-16 Thread Olivier M.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:15:19AM +0100, Matthias Hertzog wrote: Aborting search 20 records found . MICROSOFT.COM.RUNS.ON.AN.8088.ORG MICROSOFT.COM.RAWKZ.MUH.WERLD.MENTALFLOSS.CA MICROSOFT.COM.OHMYGODITBURNS.COM [...] I discovered this problem after not being able to reach microsoft's

Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?

2004-02-10 Thread Olivier M.
Hi Markus thanks for your feedback! On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Markus Wild wrote: Do big ISP have security systems, which blacklist or return a SMTP 55x after getting n*1000 mails from the same server? You'll be automatically blocked for a day if you send us more than a

[swinog] Re: [swinog] Should IDN (äöüé etc.) domains be postponed? [statement from switch]

2004-02-10 Thread Olivier M.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:48:42PM +0100, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: http://www.reisen.ch/idn/ sorry, currently only german. But interesting topic. F. And here the statement from Switch from yesterday about this issue (see below). I guess three will be many people online on 1st March at

Re: [swinog] Mass mailing: how to do it nicely?

2004-02-10 Thread Olivier M.
Wow, thx for the detailled answer! Also working late I see... :) On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:33:00PM +0100, Markus Wild wrote: It's a custom modification to sendmail-8.12.10. My recent conversion of the previous berkeley-db based approach to a central MySQL db for storing the records of

Re: [swinog] spam?

2003-11-30 Thread Olivier M.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:55:27AM +0100, John Morgan Salomon wrote: I never saw spam in person before. usually i can press the delete-button or throw some paper away but it is never happen, that spam put me out of my warm and comfortably bed. It is possible to delete this kind of spam;

Re: [swinog] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4 Packet

2003-07-18 Thread Olivier M.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 05:03:44PM +0200, Reza Kordi wrote: A client of ours has already been attacked too! We are upgrading the most urgent cases, FYI, exploits are already around: check for example: http://lists.insecure.org/lists/fulldisclosure/2003/Jul/0592.html (the attached file). And

Re: [swinog] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4 Packet

2003-07-18 Thread Olivier M.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Pascal Gloor wrote: Exploit tested on a 2600 12.1(6) IP PLUS and worked very well. Afaik everything written in the exploit could be done manually with hping. didnt tested that. Could you try with -0 --ipproto 55 --ttl 1 ? (can't (and won't) test it

Re: [swinog] ADSL and CPS on ISDN

2003-03-10 Thread Olivier M.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:15:02PM +0100, Flavio Curti wrote: but i think it does say nothing about the case where you have cps and want to get adsl with somebody else... it's just a nice decision-'influence' for everybody ordering a new isdn.. just like the heavy bluewin publicity included

Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations

2003-02-13 Thread Olivier M.
Bonjour, On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Michel Renfer wrote: We're very happy to do the offical announcement for SwiNOG-6: At this time we're searching for presentations to fill the agenda. If you have a idea or if you want to hold a presentation, please send your offer directly to

Re: [swinog] New worm / port 1434

2003-01-25 Thread Olivier M.
Good morning, On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:10:51PM +0100, Michel Renfer wrote: We (AS-LAN) blocked one customer, which seems to be infected (outgoing traffic is up to the line rate). Anyone also see such problems? yes, just saw this message on bugtraq: Subject: [bugtraq] MS SQL WORM IS

Re: [swinog] New worm / port 1434

2003-01-25 Thread Olivier M.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Olivier M. wrote: Subject: [bugtraq] MS SQL WORM IS DESTROYING INTERNET BLOCK PORT 1434! http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/308306/2003-01-22/2003-01-28/0 there are now a few attacks pro minute: omega:~ # tcpdump udp port 1434 tcpdump