[swinog] Panel Proposal for SWINOG-10 [was: Registration/Lunch SWINOG-9]

2004-09-28 Thread Roger Gottsponer
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Steven Glogger wrote: will peering be available? ;-) I know it is really early to start to discuss SWINOG-10 the day before SWINOG-9, but anyway: Peering or more precisely non-peering seems to be a hot topic and a source of frequent controversial discussions. I suggest a

RE: [swinog] IP Phones INOC DBA

2004-08-30 Thread Roger Gottsponer
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Kuster, Christian wrote: -Got no voice Too much free beer last Friday? R ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Re: [swinog] Job opening @ Hostpoint

2004-08-25 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Daniel, Make sure to also read the small-print and not to forget to send your public SSH key to us. I really wonder how many people will send their pgp key instead. Could you publish this number once you got all applications? Roger ___ swinog

Re: [swinog] geek count + 1

2004-08-15 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Was supposed to be a girl, but ROOT decided something else for us. On friday the 13th of August I became a daddy! pics 'n' stuff on http://www.spale.com/esteban/ Wow, congratulations! I did not know whether such messages are allowed by the list policy. But as all the answers so far are in a

Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations

2003-02-25 Thread Roger Gottsponer
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Viktor Steinmann wrote: I agree totally with Andre, except for the Sprint stuff - if Sprint sponsors our meeting, I'm O.k. to listen to their sales guy there. Wow. Sponsoring a meeting costs about 1500 sFr. With the planned 60 participants, this is 25 sFr per person. So

Re: [swinog] Provider Class Backbone Routers

2003-02-14 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Wow, cool discussions... Voting is ending usually in laws and regulations, control, blaming... Don't think this is what's required here. Please stay with the basics. Agreed? Sorry Kurt, SwiNOG exists since almost 3 years now, and there are rules that have been set since the begining. One

Re: [swinog] NSA Guidelines to secure Windows XP

2003-01-14 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Interesting white paper... http://nsa2.www.conxion.com/winxp/guides/wxp-1.pdf I would recommend to be somewhat careful with the NSA papers. On their cisco guideline, they suggest to configure no ip classless... Roger -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [swinog] Sunrise Problem at MIX?

2002-07-01 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Hello all, On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Thoma, Stefan wrote: Fredy, the problem was caused by us, but it's a bit more complicated. It seems ISIS (different OSI layer!) was still working on our link to Milano, but not the bgp session. As there were still two internal bgp network statements present

Re: [swinog] final agenda for swinog 4th

2002-03-11 Thread Roger Gottsponer
Chris, However, if people on this list think that there are too many vendor sessions for swinog 4th, I have no problem to cancel Clarence session and fill in the open slot with an other presentation It is really great to have Clarence in Bern. He is one of the brightest engineers I met with