Art. 45a seems like a two-edged sword. Does it mean that ISPs must
filter mails or does it mean that they have to stop spammers from
using their own network?
ISPs are explicitly allowed to filter - which gives them an easy and
clear argument against spammers crying FOUL! I want you to accept my
Good morning,
Fwd from the SIUG discussion list. New important law will be discussed
in the parlament soon.
German: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/ff/2003/index0_49.html
Francais: http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/ff/2003/index0_49.html
Italiano: http://www.admin.ch/ch/i/ff/2003/index0_49.html
From our
Of
Fredy Kuenzler
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [swinog] [Fwd: [SIUG-discuss] FMG-Revision in der
Herbstsession]
Good morning,
Fwd from the SIUG discussion list. New important law will be discussed
in the parlament soon.
German: http
well, ok, lets have a demonstration sesson on the 29th :-) i'm sure we
will
get around 100 ppl to demonstrate ,-)
everybody not demonstrating will not have the right to participate the
social event ,-)
why not change the medium of the new famous Bundesplatz-Jumping Well?
Instead of ordinary
Nik Hug wrote:
why not change the medium of the new famous Bundesplatz-Jumping Well?
Instead of ordinary water 26 different sorts of beer ... (SH= Falkenbier,
VD=Boxer, BE=Egger, AG=Müllerbräu ...
BS=Ueli Reverenz, and ZH=Corona with a little lemon bit in the top.
Am I correct in reading this law
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, John Morgan Salomon wrote:
[...]
And I'm not 100% sure of the implications of article 13 and part 7
(privacy-related bits and bobs.) Will this imply that we get to sue '1337
h4x0rz?
I'm also not sure why the commission and the Bundesamt need personal
profiles. SIUG was
