SwiNOG-14 (30-05-2006) Registration is OPEN
Hmm I think that you need to update your static content in the script
;-)
s/2006/2007
http://www.spale.com/cgi-bin/swinogreg
Chris.
Pascal Gloor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.04.2007 14:28
Dear SwiNOGers,
SwiNOG 14 will be held as usualy at the
Hi All
Anyone using those SCM-140 modems? Please contact me offlist!
cheers,
michel
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Jonathan,
Customers don't have just one email address, they have a private one (maybe
several) and some from the company. Then they are changing the location from
home to the office an back with their notebook. Maybe their mail provider is
not the same as the internet service provider. So they
Jonathan wrote:
Sorry but I disagree with Per. ISPs have a duty to prevent email Spam
which is a terrible curse for us all. If they decide that blocking
port 25 outbound will help then they should do it.
Just for the record - I don't have any problem with ISPs blocking ports
or otherwise
Jonathan,
Sorry but I disagree with Per. ISPs have a duty to prevent email
Spam which is a terrible curse for us all. If they decide that
blocking port 25 outbound will help then they should do it.
If you are a user, why can't you use the ISPs relay server? If you
are a provider you
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 19:26:39 Markus Wild wrote:
You'd be amazed how many companies operate their own mail servers, even
behind dynamic addresses (in which case they usually use some mailbox
polling mechanism to feed their server from mail from the outside), but
send outgoing mail
Seems to me that the benefit of cutting down on Spam would be worth the
trouble of using port 587...
Blocking port 25 is just a quick-n-dirty 'fix'.
What will happen when virus-writers are going to spam using 587 (The
credentials are stored on the users PC anyway..)?
What would people do to
Adrian Ulrich wrote:
Seems to me that the benefit of cutting down on Spam would be worth the
trouble of using port 587...
Blocking port 25 is just a quick-n-dirty 'fix'.
What will happen when virus-writers are going to spam using 587 (The
credentials are stored on the users PC anyway..)?
: You'd be amazed how many companies operate their own
: mail servers, even behind dynamic addresses
I'm speaking with guys in my company on an issue and part of the discussion has
to do with me saying no one runs a mail server from behind a dynamic IP
addresses. Other than just your
9 matches
Mail list logo
