On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:31:32PM +0200, Simon Leinen wrote:
I can spoof packets from my home broadband connection (and probably
the 299'999 other broadband customers of that Swiss ISP can do so as
well :-). Hopefully other Swiss ISPs do this better.
sunrise freesurf used to allow this also,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:43:39AM +0200, Olivier Mueller wrote:
what about simply replacing the mailing list by a blog? ;-)
We could call it swinog 2.0... Then we would have rss as wished
by Ruedi, anti-spam and anti-autoresponder captcha protection, etc.
What about installing
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Bernard Dugas wrote:
Do you have a direct path visibility between the 2 sites ? What length ?
Unfortunately, there is no way to do that.
Thank you for the people having answered already, I think we are on the
path to a solution. I will try to post a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:44:25PM +0100, Philippe Strauss wrote:
What do swinogers use to document their network with
logical representation (routers, switch, access-servers, firewall...
but no physical representation of a particual device like a 7200vxr
etc), I'm having a hard time with
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:23:38AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
The price seems to be a bit far out when considering that a normal
phone line (which includes the telephony infrastructure as well)
costs only CHF 25.25/Month. Reading the financial reports of Swisscom
You also have to take in
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
One of my customers has just been told he needs to pay to get a DNS
reverse map entry for thei Green ADSL line with fixed IP.
Is that really true??
I had a similar query lately, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied that
with MPS1 (1 IP
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:50:34AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
My first mini-project is to build a small Wifi (or even Bluetooth?)
hotspot (only for home use, of course) which would take its Internet feed
from one of those mobile USB GPS modems that you get for few francs a month
from
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:44:42AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Marc, the goal is not to build it from commodity parts,
but to learn how to build such systems in general :)
From scratch, starting with custom kernel build, then
tailored busybox, then web management and stuff...
You are
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:32:13AM +0100, ralf.zenklu...@barinformatik.ch wrote:
For us it was fine for a week now - since they had the ddos.
But right now we have 300 emails in queues and can't send these to
mxzhb or mxzhh :-(
Strangely, I cannot send through cablecom (no SYN/ACK received),
Hi,
It seems the Swiss POP for sixxs (IPv6 connectivity) is unreachable
from Cablecom (net2000), Sunrise ADSL, Bluewin ADSL, but is reachable
from Green ADSL.
For the records, http://www.sixxs.net/) is where you can get free IPv6
on IPv4 tunnels when your ISP hasn't yet arranged for IPv6
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:25:42PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote:
If you have a /24 you should be generally accepted by most every ISP
out there, as far as breaking aggregation of your /15, I cannot
comment (but I say: go for it)
It's not mine, unfortunately. But I am working with the owner to
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:22:04AM +0100, Peter Keel wrote:
Yes, but that's absolutely painless.
I also regret the times when Debian was only releasing every 3 years or
so, however, the current release cycle is not that fast, you still have
two years between upgrades, and obsolescence is
Hi,
in my opinion, we should refer to the domain registry as NIC/CH (or
nic.ch)
It shouldn't be named SWITCH. SWITCH can operate them as long as they
have the mission from the OFCOM/BAKOM (expires 2014?). But the name
should be NIC/CH and no mention of any SWITCH services should be made
with
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Martin Suess wrote:
I'm not at home but my boxes at home (connected via Cablecom) are still
reachable.
The main problem is that Hosting Cablecom is down, including (some)
Cablecom hosting customers. Apparently there is some routing issue.
This doesn't
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:20:25PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
I had one of this issue in Univerity too.
same in the cantonal mail server ne.ch.
customer had to hack a pipe to a procmail to change the enveloppe so
that a simple mail reflector works.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 08:54:32PM +0200, Peter Rohrer wrote:
> I sent him registered letters to both his "Sandro Achilles Photography
> Corporation" (in 2019) and to "ACHILLES ??? Management & Marketing
> Consulting" (he received it about 2 Months ago) and did not get any
> response so far. I
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> Did you get a reply to your request?
Not yet, but they still have about two weeks.
> But they don't want to do that and don't (want to) understand that this
> leads to spam complaints because the recipient never had any contact
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35:41AM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> Update about today's call with Rocket Mountains AG.
They just replied, in time.
They basically are not answering specific questions about specific e-mail
address, inclusive technical addresses that are not linked to a specific
Hello,
Thank you for this valuable information.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:21:38PM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> Please contact SECO (Lena Geiser). They know 'this case' since 2017.
> Please contact ECO.de (Mr. Brandolino). They know about him very
> recently.
I did that. Schober changed its
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 04:24:26PM +0200, Benoît Panizzon wrote:
> Today we received several delisting request for URI's and IP Addresses
> somehow associated with Newsletters sent by 'Rocketmails.ch'.
A few weeks ago, I asked SECO about Rocket Mountain AG & Rocket Leads AG /
Christian Huldi
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:30:21PM +0200, Peter Rohrer wrote:
> I sent an "Auskunftsbegehren" regarding Spam to the Whois address of
> rocketsmails.ch in 2018, and I got a first answer by mail (from
> rocketleads.ch) and later by written letter (after I send them a second
> registered mail) from
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> emails originates from Swiss Post customers who agreed that Swiss Post
> uses their data for marketing.
Well, in my case, they wrote to technical addresses that never were
communicated to the Swiss Post. SECO was informed, as this
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 06:03:28PM +0100, Peter Rohrer wrote:
> I got an answer from the federal prosecutor, unfortunately I was to
> late and didn't press charges within 3 months after knowing about the
That's really short.
It is surprising that Wrong accusations prescribe after 5 years, but
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:26:19PM +0200, Benoît Panizzon wrote:
> Actual situation: I live about 250m away form the DSLAM in the street.
> After several cases opened @ Swisscom, they found out it is just about
> a little too far away for g.fast to work properly.
About 190 m, see images:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:06:24PM +0200, Tobi wrote:
> We're seeing the same issue since 28th March. Looks like their new
> reputation system needs some fine tuning by a big hammer :-)
> Maybe they bought the same reputation system as 1&1 did not long ago.
They communicated as follows:
"Due to
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:55AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Apparently FRITZ!Box 7582 does not do Bridge mode, but Zyxel XMG3927 does.
I am running a FRITZ!Box 7582 in G.fast mode on a FTTS init7 (probably with
Swisscom behind it) in bridge mode, terminating the PPP on an apu2.
I
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 08:59:28AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> do any of you know just one legit service that is hosted by OVH?
I use them as a DNSSEC registrar. A friend had a cache which took fire.
> They own massive amount of /16 networks and many of them are already in
> my blocklist as I
Hello,
I am only using SPF, DKIM and DMARC information to up points in my
spamassassin (there are too many badly configured SPF sites around, and
they most of the time are not DNSSEC-secured). In general, SPF/DMARC
alone is not enough to mark as spam in my opinion.
However, someone reported the
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Lukas Knauer wrote:
> Was that ever available? iirc Cablecom/UPC offers either IPv4-only or
> IPv6+CGNAT (aka "Dualstack lite"). But no real dual stack.
BTW, I made a video about how to create IPv6 servers on an *end-user*
connection, and I mention the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:03:23PM +, Beat Eichenberger wrote:
> Is there a UPC mailadmin following this list?
Also, the return address for billing bounces:
: host mx2.tripolis.com[87.253.151.86] said: 450 4.1.1
: Recipient address rejected: unverified address:
User unknown in
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 02:38:58PM +0100, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:03:23PM +, Beat Eichenberger wrote:
> > Is there a UPC mailadmin following this list?
>
> Also, the return address for billing bounces:
>
> : host mx2.tripolis.com[87.
Hello,
whois alphanet.ch
works from UPC/Sunrise, SWITCH and init7 for me.
The disclaimer and some of the data are still there.
___
swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch
To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:55:23PM +0100, Patrick Studer via swinog wrote:
> We recommend remove them from computers and bring them to a company named XXX
> (to professional shred them).
As a joke, we now know where to look for your data :)
___
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:07:26PM +0100, Benoit Panizzon via swinog wrote:
> I am aware, Microsoft Office365 customer service blames this on us
> 'falsely and for no reason' blocking email from those ip addresses, and
> when presented with Evidence of what happened, they close the case
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:04:14AM +0200, Stefan via swinog wrote:
> But you know that it is already daily business that Swiss ISP's are blocking
> websites?
One of the example you give was voted by the Swiss people (Casino blocking).
ISP have no say in that matter. Some countries go way
35 matches
Mail list logo
