Re: [swinog] GCSC critical infrastructure protection questions: your input needed.

Hi * on the Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:41:29PM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote: > The work has been divided into two working-groups: one is addressing > the question of what a norm should say (i.e. “Governments shouldn’t > cyber-attack X”). It's much simpler than that. The difference between black

Re: [swinog] GCSC critical infrastructure protection questions: your input needed.

> On Nov 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM, Hendrik Jaeger wrote: > Since I have hardly thought about this topic (attacks against civilian > infrastructure), my thoughts are still rather unstructured, but I feel > it important to give you feedback, especially as I see no other >

Re: [swinog] GCSC critical infrastructure protection questions: your input needed.

Dear Bill Thank you very much for making me/us aware of this. I talked to a few people about it after starting to answer the survey and noticing that I run into a lot of problems. Since I have hardly thought about this topic (attacks against civilian infrastructure), my thoughts are still

[swinog] GCSC critical infrastructure protection questions: your input needed.

One of PCH’s long-term efforts has been to encourage governments to restrict their use of offensive cyber attacks against civilian networks. We've successfully gotten that effort out of the U.N., where it was floundering, and into a well-supported stand-alone commission. It’s being taken