Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Jeff Barnes
Did a fresh checkout of https://crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk. Changed to bindings/objc. 1) The bindings/objc/README instructions are inaccurate. There is no Makefile in build_sword. 2) The build breaks in build_sword/build_mac_sword.sh. $ cd build_clucene $ make release-fat ... looks like

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Greg Hellings
The Obj-C bindings have not been updated since Troy's major commit to deprecate methods and the like. However, the error you're seeing appears to be a result of missing some of the autofoo material that you need. Do you have any information on the state of your autotools package? That might help

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Jeff Barnes
Thanks for the quick response, Greg. PACCPL-334LAGYA:trunk jbarne200$ which autoconf /usr/bin/autoconf PACCPL-334LAGYA:trunk jbarne200$ which automake /usr/bin/automake PACCPL-334LAGYA:trunk jbarne200$ which libtool /usr/bin/libtool PACCPL-334LAGYA:trunk jbarne200$ which aclocal /usr/bin/aclocal

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Hi. The build scripts are deprecated and should be removed altogether. Try building using the ObjCSword Xcode project. I just made some code changes lately so it should still work. Manfred Am 23.01.2013 um 15:31 schrieb Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com: Thanks for the quick response, Greg.

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
If you want to build from command line you can also use something like this: # xcodebuild -target some target -configuration some config clean build The pre-lion Xcode project may also be outdated as I didn't have the time to maintain it. Manfred Am 23.01.2013 um 15:45 schrieb Manfred

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread David Haslam
Hi Daniel, I put the question to Martin Denham (the developer of And Bible). He replied: (lightly edited by me) And Bible's indexes are here: http://www.crosswire.org/and-bible/indices/v1/ but they are only guaranteed to work with And Bible and almost definitely won't work with SWORD C++

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Thule
Daniel, the indexes themselves are created using the utility mkfastmod. If built, the lucene indexes typically sit off of the modules directory directly .. ie: .../modules/texts/ztext/kjv/lucene Administrators of a repo, you can generate the lucene directories, and have them automatically

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Von: Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com The nice thing about when repo administrators do this, is when you get a module from that repo, you also automatically get the lucene index. The reason that this is not done are manifold - including that sword and jsword indices are different, that

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread DM Smith
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote: Von: Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com The nice thing about when repo administrators do this, is when you get a module from that repo, you also automatically get the lucene index. The reason that this is not done are

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Thule
Peter, DM, Thanks for your response. I wasn't being critical and I agree. There are Pros and Cons either way (resource usage and download time being considerations) as you point out. I also agree it's ultimately it's up to the repo administrator and the user, to decide for themselves what works

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Von: Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com There are Pros and Cons either way (resource usage and download time being considerations) as you point out. There are no pros and only contras. And I certainly have not pointed out any pros. Nor has DM. Please stop using my name as supposedly in

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Burrell
To add to the discussion. Step ships data files and later indexes as part of the installation of software plus automatically after installation of any module. We considered shipping indexes but decided against it. This is because indexes can become corrupt quite easily and can be incompatible

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Thule
Peter, if I offended you, I hope you'll forgive me. ~A On Wednesday, January 23, 2013, Peter von Kaehne wrote: Von: Andrew Thule thules...@gmail.com javascript:; There are Pros and Cons either way (resource usage and download time being considerations) as you point out. There are no

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.01.2013 um 19:41 schrieb Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@gmail.com: On Jan 23, 2013, at 12:05:20PM, Manfred Bergmann manfred.bergm...@me.com wrote: Just out of curiosity, what do you need the objc wrappers for? Just want to play around with the API. Develop a simple client.

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.01.2013 um 21:54 schrieb Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@gmail.com: On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:21:09PM, Manfred Bergmann manfred.bergm...@me.com wrote: OK. Can you upgrade to Lion at least? That would probably be the easiest because the this Xcode project is maintained. Last night,

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Nic Carter
Looks like the pre-Lion project hadn't been updated in a long time and so didn't have any newly required headers added to it (which you can see from the build log you pasted in a previous email). You could also look at the PocketSword source to get another idea of how to go about compiling

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Nic Carter
My suggestion would be to avoid pre-built indices. However, given I'm the one who first went about making them, I think there are pros in certain situations. :P In my situation, I get to be gatekeeper over the entire solution (PocketSword), where users cannot change the version of clucene or

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
On Jan 23, 2013, at 8:31:29PM, Nic Carter niccar...@mac.com wrote: You could also look at the PocketSword source to get another idea of how to go about compiling things? The reason I posted to sword-devel is because they own the broken build. Whoever is the objc bindings build maintainer

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Greg Hellings
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@yahoo.comwrote: On Jan 23, 2013, at 8:31:29PM, Nic Carter niccar...@mac.com wrote: You could also look at the PocketSword source to get another idea of how to go about compiling things? The reason I posted to sword-devel is

Re: [sword-devel] Location of prebuilt lucene indexes.

2013-01-23 Thread Andrew Thule
Thanks for making them .. It is appreciated! ... I find them incredibly useful (and I was surprised they worked by way of a repo too!) I am sympathetic to many of the arguements presented against creating them in repos, and I do create them for myself on the desktop (so to speak) so I also see

Re: [sword-devel] bindings/objc build broken

2013-01-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.01.2013 um 23:21 schrieb Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@gmail.com: Sent from my iPhone On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Manfred Bergmann manfred.bergm...@me.com wrote: Well, you know how Apple is. Much changes, especially over on two major versions. Many things have their advantages.