What about the inconsequent lexicon index fix i have posted here a month
ago? I realize that it would not be threated as Critical, but it is still
bad behaivior that affects every Sword frontend.
I also realize that fix would not be complete, but no one even asked me for
deeper investigation, if
On 1/14/2014 12:51 AM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
What about the inconsequent lexicon index fix i have posted here a
month ago? I realize that it would not be threated as Critical, but it
is still bad behaivior that affects every Sword frontend.
I also realize that fix would not be complete, but no
Ok, simply it is strange when i submit any work and even do not know that
it was rejected with somewhat reason...
Maybe with v11n mappings it is the same situation?
Blessings
2014/1/14 Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org
On 1/14/2014 12:51 AM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
What about the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Костя Маслюк kostyamasl...@gmail.comwrote:
What about the inconsequent lexicon index fix i have posted here a month
ago? I realize that it would not be threated as Critical, but it is still
bad behaivior that affects every Sword frontend.
I also realize that
On 1/14/2014 8:43 AM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
Ok, simply it is strange when i submit any work and even do not know
that it was rejected with somewhat reason...
We have a place to submit bugs bugfixes. It's the bug tracker:
http://www.crosswire.org/tracker/secure/Dashboard.jspa
As a bonus, you
In defense of mapping between versification system: We are using them
during translation work, and they provide advantages to the translator
where verses of different Bibles are displayed in parallel. And even if a
mapping is not perfect in the sense that it covers all cases, it still is
useful in
