If you can identify the text, we would be happy to update the name to be
more accurate (but not to be more vague, as you propose).
I actually though it would be your job to identify the modules you provide.
However, you may diff it with German Elberfelder 1905 and will most likely
find less
See also http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elberfelder_Bibel
The section headed *Zeittafel zur Geschichte der Elberfelder Bibel* has a
table of the versions history.
David
--
View this message in context:
Suggested interim remedial action:
As the authenticity of *GerElb1871* (SwordVersionDate=2003-06-19) is now
unsustainable, please move the existing module from CrossWire Main to
CrossWire Attic.
David
--
View this message in context:
Makes no sense to me. Removal is best option
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com
To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: [sword-devel] German Elberfelder 1871 Bible module isn't
authentic
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 16:05
Suggested interim
...@googlemail.com
To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Subject: [sword-devel] German Elberfelder 1871 Bible module isn't
authentic
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 16:05
Suggested interim remedial action:
As the authenticity of *GerElb1871* (SwordVersionDate=2003-06-19) is now
unsustainable, please
I have renamed the module to reflect that it is the text that is called
(by everyone on the internet) the 1871 Elberfelder. If you can identify
the text, we would be happy to update the name to be more accurate (but
not to be more vague, as you propose).
What is hopefully conveyed is that
Hello Sword-Developers,
I am writing to inform you that the Sword-Module you provide labeled
GerElb1871/German Elberfelder (1871) isn't the authentic text of 1871.
Among a lot of other verses, just check John 1,27 against
