Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-15 Thread David Haslam
Thanks Chris, for the more up to date title, which I'd come across before, but had escaped my immediate memory. If the price puts you off buying David Norton's book A textual history of the King James Bible, then use worldcat to find it in a nearby library.

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-15 Thread Mike Hart
https://archive.org/stream/holybiblefacsimi00polluoft#page/144/mode/2up The original 1611 printing of the original English Authorized Version also included (in addition to the much discussed and documented pilcrows) footnotes, cross references, and sections.. although the sections were listed

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread David Haslam
Before even contemplating starting such a project, it is advisable to become acquainted with the detailed textual history of the Authorised Version. Suggest obtain this book by F H A Scrivener. *The Authorized Version of the English Bible (1611): Its Subsequent Reprints and Modern

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread David Troidl
The character thorn can be found in the Latin-1 Supplement block of Unicode: #222; I would suggest investigating the Latin Extended blocks. There are many fonts that support them. You may find exactly the characters you are looking for. You could also check with the Medieval Unicode Font

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread Chris Little
Hi Jeffrey, There is literally no possibility that any characters in the 1611 KJV have not already been encoded in Unicode. Don't concern yourself with fonts at all. You don't need to make your own font. And we will not distribute fonts with modules. Your only concern in this area is

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread Israel
Sorry for the misinformation. I had thought someone had said there were no GUI tools, so making a module was not as simple as it could be. Please forgive my ignorance. I didn't realize it could be done so easily, do you have links to the info on how to do it, so I can be better informed and not

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread ref...@gmx.net
Check out our wiki, it has all info you would ever need Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: Israel israeld...@gmail.com To: sword-devel@crosswire.org Subject: [sword-devel] KJV 1611 Date: Sat, Dec 14, 2013 16:01 Sorry for the misinformation. I had thought someone had said

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread Ron Parker
On 2013-12-14 11:07, DM Smith wrote: The information is in the wiki (www.crosswire.org/wiki). There's a links on the home page to pretty much everything that you need to know. You can also find a transcription of Gen 1 for the 1611 KJV. Nicely done. Regarding the effort, go for it. I've

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-14 Thread jhphx
Printers at that time did a number of things that would be surprising to us today. Also, things like spellings were not as officially fixed as they are now. That means that being faithful to the text, and/or translators, is not as clear of an objective, with texts that old, as it is with some

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-13 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
Hi Swordsmen, One thing I’ve been hoping to see is someone interested enough to make a KJV 1611 module. I like the version for a few reasons, like the natural flow of the text, it’s poetic nature is beautiful to me, and the Reformation principle of clarity is followed imho. So since the Sword

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-13 Thread Israel
If you wanted to do this you would need an appropriate font. You may have to actually make a font. I suggest using fontforge as it is free (as in freedom, as well as no cost). depending on your platform this could be extremely easy to install, or you may have to go to the website to download

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-12-13 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
I don’t think I would have to make the entire font. There should be an opensource font that has the ascii. Then maybe adding a few glyphs. But do I understand that the module has to provide its own font? Can we use system fonts? I don’t know for sure, but I bet there may be a common enough

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-12 Thread Mike Hart
://archive.org/stream/1611Bible_201303/Binder1#page/n81/mode/2up From: Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@yahoo.com To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum sword-devel@crosswire.org Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:29 PM Subject: [sword-devel] KJV 1611 I've seen

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-12 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
Hi Mike, Thanks for the link and the info. On Apr 12, 2013, at 5:44:59PM, Mike Hart just_mik...@yahoo.com wrote: The KJV1611 needs to be experienced as it was originally laid out to be fully understood how different it is from the King George version of the King James Bible It included

[sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
I've seen the objections to the AV on the Crosswire website. Is there a 1611 Sword module available anywhere? It's interesting to see that the OSIS tutorial uses 1611 text. The poetry and flow of the version I find to be beautiful. It would be nice to be able to get it as a Sword module

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread DM Smith
I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as the 1611 version. You can see on the wiki Gen 1: http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/KJV_1611 We'd love to have the 1611 text but have not found a suitable etext. I'm looking for one that has the long 's' which looks like an

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread Greg Hellings
I'm unaware of the 1611 being available in SWORD format from anywhere. The 1769 version is what we have in our repositories as it is, by far, the one most people are thinking of when they claim to be talking about the 1611 version. If there is a reasonable digital source of the text it should not

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread Barnes, Jeffrey
On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as the 1611 version. Most of the folks in my circles who read KJV know the difference, although many would not know the difference between 1769 and

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread Greg Hellings
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@yahoo.comwrote: You mean U+017F? Seems like that would be a pretty easy regex. I think it's only a lower case entry that appears only if it is not the last character in a word. Any other glyphs? Most attempts I see to use that

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread DM Smith
On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote: On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org wrote: I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as the 1611 version. Most of the folks in my circles who read KJV know

Re: [sword-devel] KJV 1611

2013-04-11 Thread M. Steven Gronka
Contact Dr. Gail Riplinger to see if she can help. www.avpublications.com If anyone is likely to have what you need or know where you can get what you need it is her! On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey wrote: On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith dmsm...@crosswire.org

[sword-devel] KJV 1611

2008-07-09 Thread DM Smith
Every now and then we get a question whether we have the 1611 version of the KJV. Our answer pretty much is that they don't know what they are asking for and that if we did have it, they wouldn't be able to read it. I have put up a page in the wiki with Genesis 1. I have retained as much of