Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread DM Smith
Glad you figured it out that you had an incomplete download. Guessing: The FTP mechanism of InstallMgr can create partially downloaded modules. Alternatively, you can unzip the cached zip (from ftp/pub/sword/packages/rawzip) and unzip it to the proper folder. I’ve only ever used it on Un*x.

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread David Troidl
Thanks for the replies. It seems BibleCS itself was somehow corrupted. I reinstalled it, and my settings took affect again, and all the modules I downloaded from the new Install Manager seem to work fine. Thanks, David On 1/30/2016 11:27 AM, DM Smith wrote: Glad you figured it out that

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread DM Smith
Does dumping the module with mod2imp have the correct references for the chapters you are having problems? (i.e. is it a module problem) > On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:00 AM, David Troidl wrote: > > Hi, > > I updated to the most recent KJV module, without paying much attention

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread David Haslam
Looks like the previously installed module got corrupted. Maybe this can happen with jSword front-ends if two different modules have the same Description? http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#Uniqueness Yet BPBible and BibleCS are SWORD based, so that's not an explanation here. The

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread Greg Hellings
Let's not assume we can rule out the possibility of Windows 10 being the culprit. It has been known to remove user data and programs without warning with some recent updates. --Greg On Jan 30, 2016 10:13 AM, "David Haslam" wrote: > Looks like the previously installed

[sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread David Troidl
Hi, I updated to the most recent KJV module, without paying much attention to it. Today I was trying to access Genesis 49 in BPBible, and got the message: Genesis 49 is not in the current book. I opened BibleCS and found the KJV wouldn't access John 1. So I checked the install manager for

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2016-01-30 Thread David Troidl
I'm not sure how to use mod2imp on the installed module, but I looked at it, and the only content in the directory is this: "C:\Program Files (x86)\CrossWire\The SWORD Project\modules\texts\ztext\kjv\nt.bzs" "C:\Program Files (x86)\CrossWire\The SWORD Project\modules\texts\ztext\kjv\nt.bzv"

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-20 Thread DM Smith
On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Nic Carter wrote: Pilcrows look fun when they're red :) But that's not a bug. :P Oh, and if pilcrows could be moved to the end of the previous verse instead of the start of the current verse, that would be fun :) But all good if they're staying where they

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread Ben Morgan
Hi DM, I'm looking at it for how it displays in BPBible. Mostly it seems to show up fine. At the moment the code I had in place actually shows the tr greek text links, though it doesn't know what to look them up in (there's no dictionary matching the tr: scheme, right?). I think I'll make it

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread DM Smith
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Ben Morgan benpmor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi DM, I'm looking at it for how it displays in BPBible. Mostly it seems to show up fine. At the moment the code I had in place actually shows the tr greek text links, though it doesn't know what to look them up in

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread David Haslam
Hi DM, Did you think further about http://crosswire.org/wiki/User:Dmsmith/KJV2011#Pilcrow_signs since my last response therein? David PS. A curious aside: After Acts 20:36 there are no more pilcrows in the KJV. /Specialist historians think the 1611 printers simply ran out of the movable type

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread David Haslam
Please revert possessives back to ordinary apostrophes! See http://crosswire.org/wiki/User:Dmsmith/KJV2011#Apostrophes I already wrote to you about this, but I received no response. David -- View this message in context:

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread DM Smith
I updated the wiki with my response. They are the Unicode standard's preferred possessive apostrophe. In Him, DM On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:14 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: Please revert possessives back to ordinary apostrophes! See

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread DM Smith
Yes. I thought my prior response was sufficient. The module has had them that way for 7 years. Front-ends have a variety of ways that they handle the pilcrow. I don't see the need for the change in the module. If you take a look at the 1611, there is no space following the pilcrow:

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread Chris Little
On 2/19/2013 6:43 AM, DM Smith wrote: On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Ben Morgan benpmor...@gmail.com mailto:benpmor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi DM, I'm looking at it for how it displays in BPBible. Mostly it seems to show up fine. At the moment the code I had in place actually shows the tr greek

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread DM Smith
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Chris Little chris...@crosswire.org wrote: On 2/19/2013 6:43 AM, DM Smith wrote: On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Ben Morgan benpmor...@gmail.com mailto:benpmor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi DM, I'm looking at it for how it displays in BPBible. Mostly it seems to

Re: [sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-19 Thread Nic Carter
Pilcrows look fun when they're red :) But that's not a bug. :P Oh, and if pilcrows could be moved to the end of the previous verse instead of the start of the current verse, that would be fun :) But all good if they're staying where they are ;) There was some comments about the TR markup, and

[sword-devel] KJV update

2013-02-18 Thread DM Smith
I think I have a ready-to-release update to the KJV. Please do one last check. You can get the modules here: http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/sword/2011/kjv.zip or if you want one with a different name and in raw format: http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/sword/2011/av.zip Many

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2013-02-07 Thread David Haslam
Though Matthew 11 has been fixed already, I've reported several other text issues via private email to DM. So hold on friends until the next set of corrections are completed. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/KJV-Update-tp4651895p4651910.html Sent

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2013-02-06 Thread David Haslam
DM requested feedback. Happy to oblige. There's an error! *Matthew 11:8-23* is missing from version 2.5 of the updated KJV module that DM announced. I just ran the emptyvss utility and got this output. Matthew 11:8 Matthew 11:9 Matthew 11:10 Matthew 11:11 Matthew 11:12 Matthew 11:13 Matthew

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2013-02-06 Thread DM Smith
Thanks. It was commented out in the source. Uncovered another bug. Perhaps in osis2mod. In Him, DM On Feb 6, 2013, at 7:26 AM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote: DM requested feedback. Happy to oblige. There's an error! *Matthew 11:8-23* is missing from version 2.5 of the

Re: [sword-devel] KJV Update

2013-02-06 Thread David Haslam
Hi DM, OK - let us know when this is fixed, please. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/KJV-Update-tp4651895p4651906.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ sword-devel mailing