Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread DM Smith
The only morphology that was expected was robinson: > On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:51 PM, Dudeck, John wrote: > > > > JSword allows the setting of a

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread Dudeck, John
> JSword allows the setting of a Greek Mophology module. It doesn’t use the > work given in the morph or lemma attributes. Forked XST can provide a > different mechanism. Ok so this answers why Packard seems to be ignored. But the question remains why LXX does not display the Morphology,

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread David Haslam
Snippets of knowledge about how JSword does things differently than SWORD ought really to be documented in the developers’ wiki. Is there a volunteer? David Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 21:27, DM Smith wrote: > JSword allows the setting of a Greek Mophology module. It

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread DM Smith
JSword allows the setting of a Greek Mophology module. It doesn’t use the work given in the morph or lemma attributes. Forked XST can provide a different mechanism. — DM Smith From my phone. Brief. Weird autocorrections. > On Feb 7, 2019, at 3:26 PM, pierre amadio wrote: > > Hi there ! > >

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread DM Smith
JSword does not use the GlobalOptionFilter or Feature values for rendering. Overview: JSword converts module content into OSIS then renders that with parameterized XSLT. Each JSword frontend uses a forked version of Bible Desktop’s XSLT. All bets are off if the module is badly encoded. It

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread pierre amadio
Hi there ! I find it strange that the LXX module tells it is using packard's morphological code. Earlier in 2018, I started to use the LXX module (Version 2.5) and installed the Packard module as well. Then, i realised that the tool I was using gave me a lot of wrong information. The error were

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-07 Thread Dudeck, John
Further info: I dumped the LXX and TR modules using mod2imp. 1) I see that the LXX morphology uses the module packard. So I downloaded packard from Crosswire. 2) I see that those words that do not have a Strongs number have the morphology duplicated in the Strongs field (!!!) So in Malachi

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-06 Thread Dudeck, John
The behavior in AndBible for the LXX is rather odd. It doesn't matter where you look in the text, the symptoms appear the same everywhere. When you tap '' to display Strongs numbers, it displays the Strongs numbers, BUT for those words where there is no Strongs, it displays a Morphology

Re: [sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-05 Thread David Haslam
LXX installed in PocketSword can display both or either. There are some tagging errors such as the one I spotted in the first word of Malachi 1:1 I’ve not looked at more than one location before responding on whether the 2 features work. Could it be AndBible or did you perhaps sample a

[sword-devel] LXX Strongs & Morphology

2019-02-05 Thread Dudeck, John
Greetings. I've just tried loading the LXX in AndBible. Supposedly it has both Strongs numbers and Morphology tagging. But in AndBible it only displays Morphology when there is no Strongs number on a given word. And in that case it tries to look up the Morphology in Strongs. In Xiphos you can