On 08/16/2013 06:37 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
Well thanks to the magic of git, you wouldn't lose anything except your
log in functionality if github ever goes away. Oh, you'd also lose
issues
information about who branched your code, etc, but you wouldn't know
that with gitorious either. The
Not sure what you mean about free vs proprietary. We're not paying anything
to have the CrossWire organisation in github. Chris
On 14 Aug 2013 15:54, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2012 09:13 PM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at
I guess it's about githubs source code isn't entirely free software.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Chris Burrell ch...@burrell.me.uk wrote:
Not sure what you mean about free vs proprietary. We're not paying anything
to have the CrossWire organisation in github. Chris
On 14 Aug 2013 15:54,
On 08/16/2013 11:50 AM, Mark Trompell wrote:
I guess it's about githubs source code isn't entirely free software.
To be exact, I am more concerned about my ability to install my own
installation of the gitorious. It is my paranoia of having my data under
the control (or at least being able to
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 11:50 AM, Mark Trompell wrote:
I guess it's about githubs source code isn't entirely free software.
To be exact, I am more concerned about my ability to install my own
installation of the gitorious. It is my
On 12/17/2012 09:13 PM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious:
Gitorious web page:
https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk
I haven't been satisfied with this mirror (not proper names in git
fashion, no branches, and no tags), so I
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2012 09:13 PM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious:
Gitorious web page:
https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk
I haven't been satisfied with this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.12.2012 00:48, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Hi Jaak. Of course I would discourage confusing potential
developers with an unofficial fork of the SWORD library on
gitorious.
I agree that this would cause confusion. It were better to avoid.
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18.12.2012 07:11, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
I have been following the discussion on the SFTP patch and hadn't
seen it come to a conclusion yet regarding what might be necessary
to detect SSL support in cURL. I don't feel I've been negligent
with
On 18/12/12 01:10, Greg Hellings wrote:
Sword's SVN (I'm guessing from gcc 4.7 patches?) but BibleTime can
only reliably track released versions for the sake of packaging
systems.
Are you sure about this? There are many many packages in Fedora (and I
believe Debian will be in the same
On 18/12/12 06:11, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Regarding release schedules, our private email conversation, Karl, were
productive and I thought I had outlined a plan to you. I accept the
http://producingoss.com/en/setting-tone.html#avoid-private-discussions
Please.
Matěj
Dear Jaak,
I appreciate the heart of your last two emails. Collaboration has
always been at the core of our purpose for the existence of CrossWire
and I would love nothing more than to share together in work with you.
Before I answer specifics in your emails, may I please suggest that you
Hi Jaak,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jaak Ristioja j...@ristioja.ee wrote:
...
I work as a C/C++ engineer, I have a MSc in Computer Science,
specializing in programming language theory. At work, I refactor a lot
of code, I read the ANSI C and C++03/C++11 standards (drafts) almost
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
scr...@crosswire.org wrote:
I deserve the rebuke for the release schedule. The release schedule was not
even mentioned in the email to which I responded.
Are you the only person capable of making a release? I remember talk,
I believe it was in
On 18 December 2012 13:28, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18/12/12 01:10, Greg Hellings wrote:
were mentioned (but Linux packagers will absolute forbid that); once
That's just plainly not true if that should read all Linux packagers
... see for example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
The Mirror
==
I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious:
Gitorious web page:
https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk
Git URLs:
https://git.gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk.git
Can I suggest we put this on github under the crosswire organisation? We
already have JSword there...
github.com/crosswire
Chris
On 17 December 2012 20:13, Jaak Ristioja j...@ristioja.ee wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
The Mirror
==
I created a
The use of SVN is increasingly viewed by opensource developers as an
indication of the poor health of an opensource project. The traffic that I
have seen here indicates that it is not the case for this project but it
doesn't change the fact that it's use will warn potential developers away.
On
I would agree with the above with the caveat that some recent very good,
very alive Apache projects are still using SVN, e.g. Hadoop, Accumulo, etc.
Having said that Git makes collaborating that much easier, branches are
cheap and easy, forks are easy, pulling pushing changes back from a fork
is
Hi Jaak. Of course I would discourage confusing potential developers
with an unofficial fork of the SWORD library on gitorious.
But I'm confused by your comments.
My apologies if I have any outstanding commits in my queue from you
which I haven't committed. Do I?
My complaint against the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Troy A. Griffitts scr...@crosswire.org wrote:
Hi Jaak. Of course I would discourage confusing potential developers with
an unofficial fork of the SWORD library on gitorious.
I have been maintaining a personal SWORD repository on github for
quite some time now
1) writing an alternative backend for BibleTime to replace Sword,
sounds like a lot of work and that time could hopefully be better spent in
other ways? :/
2) writing a better wrapper around Sword which would hide its
deficiencies,
Both MacSword/Eloquent PocketSword use wrappers, but
Troy A. Griffitts scr...@crosswire.org writes:
I'm not quite sure why the rebellious nature of your email, instead of
a friendly conversation
Troy,
I can summarize with a pair of excruciatingly simple, personal examples
why this sort of rebellious plan comes into play. I've got no
I deserve the rebuke for the release schedule. The release schedule was not
even mentioned in the email to which I responded.
The NASB ball was dropped by at least 2 volunteers before I personally took the
task to finally make it happen (unwillingly, but I did commit and spend quite a
bit of
On 17/12/12 21:13, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
The Mirror
==
I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious:
Gitorious web page:
https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk
Why don't you use https://gitorious.org/sword? I keep the project alive
just for this
25 matches
Mail list logo
