[symfony-devs] Re: Namespaces in PHP5.3

2007-10-02 Thread Ian P. Christian
Dave Dash wrote: Wow... if that's for real. My suspicion is that this feature needs to mature first in PHP, and then the symfony team would need to be comfortable setting 5.3 as a minimum requirement... I think that might be a while, simply because it's not widespread enough. I could very

[symfony-devs] Re: Namespaces in PHP5.3

2007-10-02 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
Ian P. Christian wrote: Dave Dash wrote: Wow... if that's for real. My suspicion is that this feature needs to mature first in PHP, and then the symfony team would need to be comfortable setting 5.3 as a minimum requirement... I think that might be a while, simply because it's not

[symfony-devs] Re: About the new validation system

2007-10-02 Thread Nicolas Perriault
2007/10/2, Tamcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However, $post = new Post; $post-validateDate('This is not a day!'); // throws an exception - which doesn't seem right to me. Here you can do: try { $post = new Post(); $post-validateDate('prout'); $post-save(); } catch (sfValidateException $e) {

[symfony-devs] Re: Should symfony 1.1 be called symfony 2.0?

2007-10-02 Thread Bert-Jan
that point exposed by Tamcy is important. When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, the linux kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x dev( it's become a 22 stable) ), much more with not IT people. Not really on topic anymore but FYI: the

[symfony-devs] Re: Should symfony 1.1 be called symfony 2.0?

2007-10-02 Thread Fabien POTENCIER
even and odd versions were used before the symfony 1.0 release. We don't use them anymore. Fabien Bert-Jan wrote: that point exposed by Tamcy is important. When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, the linux kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x

[symfony-devs] Re: About the new validation system

2007-10-02 Thread Matthias N.
For me it is important that the result is very similar as with symfony 1.0: The validation manager must be able to validate ALL fields and must not stop (throw exceptions or whatever) at the first problem. And I want to have an easy way/helper to get to the results of a certain field (like the

[symfony-devs] Re: About the new validation system

2007-10-02 Thread Fabien POTENCIER
The end user won't have to deal with validation exceptions. It will be wrapped in a sfForm object. You will have to catch exception only if you use validators on their own (which will be quite rare). Fabien Matthias N. wrote: For me it is important that the result is very similar as with

[symfony-devs] Re: Should symfony 1.1 be called symfony 2.0?

2007-10-02 Thread Lucas Stephanou
ok, no problem here. but how we can define core part of symfony, as I said , can be usefull to name next releases. On 10/2/07, Fabien POTENCIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: even and odd versions were used before the symfony 1.0 release. We don't use them anymore. Fabien Bert-Jan wrote: