> that point exposed by Tamcy is important. > > When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, the > linux > kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x dev( it's become a 22 > stable) ), much more with not IT people.
Not really on topic anymore but FYI: the even=stable/odd=unstable scheme has been abandoned in the kernel about 2 years ago. That's why they've built quite a lot of new stuff into it but there still isn't a 2.7.x branch for development. Currently, work is being done on the 2.6.23 kernel and when that's released it's officially a stable version. The release candidates are for development and testing. > Why? to a quick assign of status of development and a speed/activity off > dev > that way can be more helpfull. > > according with first Francois post, IMHO, the next release can be named > 1.5, > or better 1.9. :-D. > > but, Francois, usually major versions increases when core part of > framework/project/wathever did a BC or change much things of first > concepts > of the framework, then I ask you, what we can define what is core part of > symfony and what is not ? > this can help in that kind of questions > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
