Hi,
ok will solve bugs.
and can you guide me in proposal?
Go the the issue tracker, search for bugs related to
summation (if you like) and look maybe for the label
easy to fix. Then propose a few and let us know which
ones you try to work on.
About the proposal: see what is implemented by
Until today I thought, if solve returns a nonempty dict, then there is a
(complete) solution to the provided system.
However this is apparently not the case:
solve([y, x], x)
{x:0}
Moreover, this behavior seems not to be consistent
solve([x, y], y)
[]
(results from SymPy 0.7.4.1 on
What should I do if I am willing to introduce some to functions and new
topics which is not available (related to linear algebra).
What should my next step. Should I discuss those topics here
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To
What should I do if I am willing to introduce some new functions and new
topics which is not available (related to linear algebra).
What should my next step. Should I discuss those topics here
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To
Hi mentors,
I am gsoc aspirant. I am planning to implement lie group method for 2nd
order ode, computer algebra for 1st and 2nd order differential equation.
But I am new to Sympy so I am having a little difficulty to understand the
code of ode.py. I need a little guidance to use inner of
Hello,
I was double-checking an integral with sympy, and noticed that the
software comes up with the wrong answer. The integrand has five terms,
which can be collected into three groups. Two of the groups -- Ec1 and Ec2
-- cancel after integrating over z. Strangely, sympy gets the answer
hi, i am a computer science undergraduate from Netaji subash institute of
technology. i am bit excited about series expansion as a whole.
i have gone through gruntz paper( On Computing Limits in a Symbolic
Manipulation System)( near to completion) that not only explains calculations
of limits
Hi,
I'm new to sympy and I'm trying to understand how to use dsolve. (I'm
creating an ipython notebook for a class.)
I'm creating my DE like this:
de = Eq(u(t).diff(t, t) + 4*u(t), 0)
print(de)
4*u(t) + Derivative(u(t), t, t) == 0
soln = dsolve(de, u(t))
print(soln)
u(t) == C1*sin(2*t) +
Hi,
I am Zeel Shah from India. I am final year B.Tech CS student from DA-IICT.
Basically I want to take part in this year’s GSOC consisting projects in
python. I have experience of python more than one and half year. I have
worked on Panda3d in python and I am currently working on my
Hello
I am Tushar Garg form BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus and am interested to
work for SymPy for this year of GSoC project. Could you kindly tell me the
next step i must take for the same.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe
This is in some sense a bug. The solution is correct mathematically.
The biggest issue with it is actually that there are four constants,
not two. This is because the solver currently outputs four terms and
relies on the constant simplification to reduce them to two. But the
terms don't simplify
I forgot to mention, don't worry about the formatting too much on the
GitHub wiki, as you will have to paste the application into a
different form in Melange.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
We've received a lot of interest in GSoC this year,
@asmeurer @skirpichev @certik @jo I have drafted a proposal for my project.
You can find it
at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application-Aditya-Shah-SymPy-Parsing-Framework.
Please review it and leave your suggestions below.
Thanks,
Aditya
PS- I have yet to add the timeline
Our constant simplifier work for only one variable. Someone might go
try to implementing it for multiple variables. Our PDE module needs
that.
There a paper on this by Neil Soiffer called Collapsing Constants
that deals with such stuff.
*I am Rohit Shinde from India. *
I study in the city of Pune in an engineering college. I am interested in
working on a project under sympy for GSoC 2014. This will be the first time
that I am applying for GSoC.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello SymPyoneers!
Some of you may have already seen this, but I've been working on a draft
PEP for adding a dedicated matrix multiplication operator to core Python:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4351
I've already alerted this list about it. You'll want to read the
discussion at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sympy/infix/sympy/22w9ONLa7qo/7B8Vhks46hMJ.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:22 PM, n...@vorpus.org wrote:
Hello SymPyoneers!
Some of you may have already seen
Hello Mentors,
I want to apply for GSoC 2014. I am interested in the Series Expansion
project given on the ideas page.
Please tell me how to proceed further on this idea. I have programmed for
some time in Python. But I am not really a python expert. I am trying to
understand the source code
good one
when i have to submit proposal to sympy?
is there any time limit?
Thank you very much for your support :)
On Saturday, 8 March 2014 19:21:33 UTC+5:30, rl wrote:
Hi,
ok will solve bugs.
and can you guide me in proposal?
Go the the issue tracker, search for bugs related to
Nice proposal. You may want to add a section showing a rough mock-prototype
(API) of your work. This will make it easier for others to understand what
you are aiming at. Also, you seem to have made two identical wiki pages for
your proposal. Delete one of them.
On Sunday, February 16, 2014
Speaking of printing, we need to fix the baseline in the pretty
printer. The printing of MatMul with block matrices looks pretty bad.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
In order to simplify these further you'll need to break down
Am 09.03.2014 03:22, schrieb n...@vorpus.org:
I'd really appreciate comments and feedback from you guys -- esp. since
sympy is probably the most prominent library that *doesn't* currently
follow the numpy convention of using * for elementwise multiplication. Does
this seem like something that
One criticism on your PR.
The claim is that @ is a majority vote of relevant projects, but when I
look at the actual list of projects, I'm seeing that 60% of the projects
still need to implement @.
That's quite far from a majority vote, and you're not listing projects
that oppose the idea.
23 matches
Mail list logo
