The domain argument is likely undocumented. The polys are unfortunately not
so well documented, beyond the docstrings on the methods of Poly. You
could also look at Mateusz Paprocki's master's thesis.
Regarding rebuilding the docs, as far as I know Sphinx doesn't generate
TOCs for methods. Maybe
Hi Francesco,
I'm sorry for my long latency time.
Concerning a Lie algebra defined by the structure constants: keep in mind
this is a way often used in Physics, which is not very rigorous. Structure
constants define an equivalence class of bases in a Lie algebra.
For example, consider a
Hi,
First of all, thanks Sergey for all the work you have done, from
coding, pull request reviews, GSoC mentoring and other things. I am
sad that you decided to leave, but you have the right to decide that
way of course.
I wanted to say a few words publicly about this, since a few of you
might
Try Symbol('Delta R') -- note Symbol vs symbols.
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 3:14:02 AM UTC-6, David Roilo wrote:
hello everybody,
I'm new to sympy and I need some help to create symbols.
In particular, I need to create a Symbol which looks like ΔR
In SymPy, If I input
Shubham,
Please read through this page:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/introduction-to-contributing
Let us know if you have any questions.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Shubham Jain shubham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am Shubham
On 21/01/15 15:00, AMiT Kumar wrote:
Though, I am comparatively new to SymPy, but I have pinged Sergey a lot for
PR reviews, his comments always had some sort of learning involved. Today I
feel pretty disappointed as Sergey has left Sympy. He has been a great
source of learning for me
Thanks to Sergey for all the PRs you've helped me wade through, including
the dead-end signs that you posted along the way! I was hoping you would be
around longer than me (who has been trying to leave for about 2 years now)!
Thanks to all (lilke Ondrej) who have been willing to offer help and
On 01/21/2015 08:26 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
The domain argument is likely undocumented.
Thats a pity.
The polys are unfortunately
not so well documented, beyond the docstrings on the methods of Poly.
What I am looking for is the documentation of the constructor of Poly.
Suppose, I would
Hello all
Is it too greedy to ask computer to give symbolic expression for this
matrix? I can't get the result either from mathematicaTM or sage.
a11,a12,a13,a14,a15,a16,a22,a23,a24,a25,a26,a33,a34,a35,a36,a44,a45,a46,a55,
a56,a66 = var(
Not only make your variables real, give them a sign (positive, for example:
var('x', positive=True) is real and positive). This might still not be
enough to allow the sign to be determined, however...I kind of doubt that
it will, but that is a step in the right direction.
On Wednesday, January
I try to include sympy in teaching material.
When doing this, the focus is not on programming nor implementation
details. The CAS should be as transparent as possible. The CAS-using
code should read like the math done in a textbook.
I think sympy is very close to this. However, there are some
Hi,
On 21 January 2015 at 22:06, Bastian Weber bastian.we...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
On 01/21/2015 08:26 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
The domain argument is likely undocumented.
Thats a pity.
Yeah, documentation of polys module is below standards.
The polys are unfortunately
not so well
Thanks Chris. At most I can add aij to be real positive, the computation
may still take unreasonable of time. I guess this task is unrealistic and
numerical solution could be the only way.
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 5:09:19 PM UTC-5, Chris Smith wrote:
Not only make your variables
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Junwei Huang jwhuang1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all
Is it too greedy to ask computer to give symbolic expression for this
matrix? I can't get the result either from mathematicaTM or sage.
a11,a12,a13,a14,a15,a16,a22,a23,a24,a25,a26,a33,a34,a35,a36,a44,a45,a46,
It's a pretty well known issue with solve. dict=True is a decent
workaround. You can also take a look at the new solveset (I don't remember
if this was merged before the 0.7.6 release), which tries to make the
return type of solve always be a Set object (this also will allow solve to
return
It was great working with you Sergey. You and Matthew were the best
combination of mentors I could have got. So, Thank you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Hello Everyone,
I am Shubham Jain, an undergraduate currently studying in BITS Pilani
University.
I was going through the project idea list of GSoC 2014,
I am more than willing to work for Group Theory Project under the notion of
Mathematics Projects as my GSOC '15 project.
I know C, Python and
Though, I am comparatively new to SymPy, but I have pinged Sergey a lot for
PR reviews, his comments always had some sort of learning involved. Today I
feel pretty disappointed as Sergey has left Sympy. He has been a great
source of learning for me atleast.
His contribution to SymPy is
18 matches
Mail list logo
