d also on the
Sympy current applications page
<https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2021-Current-Applications>.
Thanks
Warm Regards
Kartik Sethi
GitHub - ks147 <https://github.com/ks147/>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy"
of QR and Cholesky Decompositions.
Thanks
Kartik
On Sunday, 21 March 2021 at 4:45:10 pm UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 10:51, Kartik Sethi wrote:
> >
> > There is already a PR #21120 which is trying to implement DomainScalar
> class
> > which is why I d
I add improvements to DomainScalar as one of the objectives in my proposal.
I am a little confused about this.
Kartik
On Sunday, 21 March 2021 at 3:23:48 pm UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 07:48, Kartik Sethi wrote:
> >
> > S.Y. Lee, in #20987 It is outlined that there i
hat do you think?
On Saturday, 20 March 2021 at 6:26:07 pm UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote:
> > Mind me jumping in the discussion for this, but I have some comments
> Not at all.
> S.Y. Lee what do you suggest I work on instead of these decompositions. I
> have added some fraction-free
review my GSoC application
>> draft?
>> I've posted it here
>> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2021-Current-Applications
>>
>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 11:44:49 am UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote:
>>
>>> Oscar Benjamin, could you review this fir
Oscar Benjamin, Have you had a chance to review my GSoC application draft?
I've posted it here
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2021-Current-Applications
On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 11:44:49 am UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote:
> Oscar Benjamin, could you review this first draft of
day, 9 March 2021 at 6:49:29 am UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 16:00, Kartik Sethi wrote:
> >
> > Oscar Benjamin, what if someone else also puts up this same proposal to
> improve the DomainMatrix module for Gsoc. How does sympy decide which
> person will work
Oscar Benjamin, what if someone else also puts up this same proposal to
improve the DomainMatrix module for Gsoc. How does sympy decide which
person will work on it.
On Monday, 1 March 2021 at 12:16:35 pm UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I'll start look
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll start looking into methods that can be made
faster and also look into making DomainMatrix more complete.
On Sunday, 28 February 2021 at 8:08:15 pm UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 14:26, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> >
> > The most useful thing that a
. to that list.
Since DomainMatrix class seems a lot faster, users would actually be able
to use these functions for matrices.
What do you think?
On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 12:51:46 pm UTC+5:30 Kartik Sethi wrote:
> Thanks for listing out the issues. I'll start looking into them
>
> On S
Thanks for listing out the issues. I'll start looking into them
On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 4:00:01 am UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 11:33, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> > This is not listed anywhere on the ideas page or really documented
> > anywhere yet but there is a new
Thanks for listing out some of the issues. I'll start looking into them.
On Sunday, 21 February 2021 at 4:00:01 am UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 11:33, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
> > This is not listed anywhere on the ideas page or really documented
> > anywhere yet but there is
class
would be a suitable Gsoc Proposal?
On Saturday, 20 February 2021 at 5:04:13 pm UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 07:40, Kartik Sethi wrote:
> >
> > Hey, my name is Kartik Sethi. I am interested in taking part in Gsoc
> this year. I have been contributing to
Hey, my name is Kartik Sethi. I am interested in taking part in Gsoc this
year. I have been contributing to sympy for the past couple of months.
I have come up with a few ideas for Gsoc. I am focusing primarily on the
sympy matrices module.
1. Implementing complete Singular Value
14 matches
Mail list logo
