This is great.
Yes, so far it is quite buggy. sin(x) gives a NameError, and x + y
gives a pretty nasty error. Also you should think about good error
messages, because even if you fix these bugs, the parser will still be
heuristic, and so there will still be things that won't be recognized
as
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great.
Yes, so far it is quite buggy. sin(x) gives a NameError, and x + y
gives a pretty nasty error. Also you should think about good error
messages, because even if you fix these bugs, the parser will still be
Am 09.09.2012 01:43, schrieb David Li:
Okay, so I've worked a bit on implicit multiplication and implicit function
application for sympify. A demo of SymPy Gamma with the changes is at
http://sympy-gamma-li.appspot.com/ (+ a visual overhaul, update to Python
2.7 runtime, new Django version).
Alright, so for the SymPy changes, I'll better document the code. Also, I
was planning on using namedtuples instead of the plain tuples that I
currently am using just to make it clearer what the data represents.
For Gamma, should I remove the notebook? It doesn't work anymore (I don't
think it
Am 09.09.2012 17:47, schrieb David Li:
Also, I
was planning on using namedtuples instead of the plain tuples that I
currently am using just to make it clearer what the data represents.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to
Okay, so I've worked a bit on implicit multiplication and implicit function
application for sympify. A demo of SymPy Gamma with the changes is at
http://sympy-gamma-li.appspot.com/ (+ a visual overhaul, update to Python
2.7 runtime, new Django version). Expressions like
