Fibonacci Reverse Calculation?
Hi All!
I was reading Dr Knotts entries about Binets formula on his fibonacci page
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibFormula.html
I entered the formula into an Excel spreadsheet to see how this would work ;
Binet Formula
Fib(n) =
Hi Prince,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Prince Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I have already submitted my proposal on "Implementation of Holonomic
> function" .I had almost completed the theoratical part of it and right now
> having a analysis on how to implement the required
Hi,
I have already submitted my proposal on "Implementation of Holonomic
function" .I had almost completed the theoratical part of it and right now
having a analysis on how to implement the required operations using the
given tool.
I just wanted to know that if anyone other than me too have
Is \00\ supposed to be a symbol named "\00\"? If so, you can wrap it
with Symbol and a string like Symbol(r"\00\"). That is
s = 'L*P**2*Q**3{-b*l*conjugate(p)*Symbol(r"\00\") + -a*p*q**3*Symbol("\11\")}'
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Luv Agarwal wrote:
>
Hi Björn,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Björn Dahlgren wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, 30 August 2015 23:00:43 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> That sounds like a good idea. Having them in a separate repo would make it
>> less of a big deal to include inline plots in the notebooks.
>
Hi Björn and Aaron,
Seems like a good idea Björn.
Although, as I had already told you Aaron, that I had started working on
iPython Notebooks for SymPy Gamma here
- https://sympy-gamma-testing.appspot.com/ . Though there seems to be some
problem I guess with Jupyter itself. I'll try and fix
You can see how mpmath works here
http://mpmath.org/doc/current/technical.html#representation-of-numbers.
It basically uses man*2**exp binary representation. For instance
In [249]: Float("0.1")._mpf_
Out[249]: (0, 3602879701896397, -55, 52)
The first entry is the sign (positive). The next two
I was going to suggest solve_undetermined_coeffs, but it doesn't seem
to work on multivariate polynomials.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Jason Moore wrote:
> Say I have an expression that I know is quadratic in u1, u2, u3:
>
> expr = k00*u1**2 + k01*u1*u2 +
On 5 April 2016 at 18:21, Isuru Fernando wrote:
>
> I think the current way of representing Floats is reasonable.
>
> Float internally keeps it in binary representation, so any non-terminating
> number in base 2 is truncated when stored as a Float. That's why there is a
> string
On 5 April 2016 at 18:08, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't know if it should be considered a bug, but it's worth noting
>>> that if you want SymPy to give the right precision in
On 7 April 2016 at 13:50, Luv Agarwal wrote:
> Also, is this the right place to ask questions?
It is although I don't know the answer to your question. Be patient...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To
Also, is this the right place to ask questions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
Hey, I am doing some calculations. I wanted to print the following string
as pretty_print:
*s = 'L*P**2*Q**3{-b*l*conjugate(p)|00\ + -a*p*q**3|11\}'*
One way I could think is to apply *parse_expr* first and then pretty print
but it can't take '\'s and brackets (Is there any way to ignore these
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 23:00:43 UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good idea. Having them in a separate repo would make it
> less of a big deal to include inline plots in the notebooks.
>
Yes, I have strong feelings against checking in any inline plots (or
generated binary
14 matches
Mail list logo