[sympy] Re: Useful GSoC Idea

2020-03-26 Thread Jackson Morris
Hello there, I just commented on the issue, but I figure that this is a better way to communicate. Here is my comment from the issue: I would certainly be interested in working on this for GSoC. I am still getting familiar with the internals of sympy, but I think that this would be right up

Re: [sympy] GSOC applicants sending off-list emails

2020-03-26 Thread Aaron Meurer
I tend to take the same approach. I don't think there is anything about this in the student instructions on the wiki, but we can add something. Aaron Meurer On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:07 PM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > Hi all, > > Over the past couple of months I have lost count of the number of >

Re: [sympy] Useful GSoC Idea

2020-03-26 Thread Oscar Benjamin
Hi Ondrej, What exactly what the project do? Is there a wider approach that can be taken that handles this sort of thing? Oscar On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 21:38, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a great idea for a GSoC project: > >

Re: [sympy] Useful GSoC Idea

2020-03-26 Thread Aaron Meurer
Yes, presently the integral transforms code don't do any kind of table lookups. They just try to compute the integral, and if the integral can't be computed it can't give a result. In this case, the integral itself is wrong and it should be fixed. This has been mentioned in some other issues as

[sympy] GSOC applicants sending off-list emails

2020-03-26 Thread Oscar Benjamin
Hi all, Over the past couple of months I have lost count of the number of times that I have been emailed off-list by people interested in applying for GSOC with sympy this year. It's excellent that so many people are interested but I have not replied to *any* off-list emails and I don't intend

[sympy] Useful GSoC Idea

2020-03-26 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi, Here is a great idea for a GSoC project: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/2803#issuecomment-604697523 Would any student be interested? I know at least one user who couldn't use SymPy because of that. So fixing it would be very useful to a lot of people. The scope of the GSoC project

Re: [sympy] GSOC:Systems of Ordinary Differential Equations

2020-03-26 Thread Oscar Benjamin
Anyone is welcome to contribute to work on systems of ODEs. There is a lot written about this here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/ODE-Systems-roadmap Some work is already going on here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/18720 You can also see the open issues here:

[sympy] SymPy Community Introduction

2020-03-26 Thread Benjamin Wu
Hello all! I'm a budding Python user of about two years now, and I'm still fairly new to open-source projects. I'm also a sophomore at university studying applied mathematics, and my main focus is in linear algebra and its applications. My first exposure was Gilbert Strang's 18.06 on MIT

[sympy] Introduction for GSoc

2020-03-26 Thread Gaurav Suryawanshi
Hello Everyone, My name is Gaurav Suryawanshi, I'm a 4th Year Undergraduate student from the department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur enrolled in its 5-Year Integrated Masters course of Mathematics and Computing. My major is Mathematics at Integrated Masters' level

Re: [sympy] [Discussion] GSOC 2020: Python3 support for sympy-live

2020-03-26 Thread Aaron Meurer
I would suggest that anyone looking at SymPy Live for GSoC to take a look at RunThis https://regro.github.io/runthis-docs/ It is a new tool being developed by my colleague Anthony Scopatz to do SymPy Live-like things (running a session in the browser), but in a more general way. It would be great

[sympy] GSOC:Systems of Ordinary Differential Equations

2020-03-26 Thread Dvsm
Respected Sir, Ive gone through the problem details regarding the Systems of Ordinary Differential Equations .I wish to discuss about the ideas and be a part of its development. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from

[sympy] [Discussion][GSoc] Advancing SymPy Gamma and SymPy live using Natural Language Processing ?

2020-03-26 Thread Moses Paul
To introduce Natural Language Processing to these projects to help them better translate expressions and queries to mathematical symbols. To extend the parsing support for SymPy Gamma by including support for syntaxes from languages such as Julia, Matlab, Lua etc, which would improve the way

[sympy] Advancing SymPy Live and SymPy Gamma with Natural Language Processing

2020-03-26 Thread Moses Paul
To introduce Natural Language Processing to these projects to help them better translate expressions and queries to mathematical symbols. To extend the parsing support for SymPy Gamma by including support for syntaxes from languages such as Julia, Matlab, Lua etc, which would improve the way

Re: [sympy] Re: [Discussion] GSoC 2020: Improving and extending ODE

2020-03-26 Thread Milan Jolly
Thanks for your feedback. I will submit the proposal soon. On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, 3:21 AM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > I had a quick look and it seems reasonable. > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Milan Jolly wrote: > > > > If there are no issues with the proposal or the timeline mentioned(which > I

[sympy] Re: Port MatchPy to C++20

2020-03-26 Thread manik taneja
I also looked at clang for compiling the coroutines implemented code with generators . The C++20 standard specifies std::generator<> but clang 9.0.0 does not implement it so we would need to have a generator header file also to implement it in the MatchPycpp code. On Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Re: [sympy] Proposal draft - Probabilities project

2020-03-26 Thread Basilis Kalos
Hi all, thank you very much for your useful comments! The functionalities I was suggesting, are mainly intended to be implemented for the Markov chains modules in the stochastic processes package and they are: - · Checking for periodicity and reducibility. - · In

Re: [sympy] Re: Port MatchPy to C++20

2020-03-26 Thread manik taneja
Actually I saw that the primary issue was to incorporate coroutines and use generators in the already established matchpycpp file in the repository so I’ve started working on that I should be able to send you the draft codes soon . Thank you On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 12:56 PM, manik taneja wrote:

Re: [sympy] Proposal draft - Probabilities project

2020-03-26 Thread Gagandeep Singh (B17CS021)
Currently, Markov chains use transition matrix with T[i][j] representing the probability of the process going to state j from state i. Infact, that's what we expect from user to give as an important information for Markov chains on the basis of which computations will be performed. Most of the

Re: [sympy] Re: Port MatchPy to C++20

2020-03-26 Thread manik taneja
I am starting to get a hold of the porting technique and the logic shall I start by working to port parts of expressions.py ( https://github.com/HPAC/matchpy/blob/master/matchpy/expressions/expressions.py ) to c++20 ? Also Sir , I've read through your work and the implementations before starting

[sympy] Jamil's GSOC 2020 Introduction

2020-03-26 Thread Jamil Bousquet
Hello Sympy team/enthusiasts, My name is Jamil Bousquet, I'm a Computer Science Major from Saint Lucia on his 3rd semester and I'm proficient at python having used it for almost 4 years. I'm currently doing college level Discrete Structures and Calculus and will likely be doing and intro to

Re: [sympy] Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC idea about ODE

2020-03-26 Thread mohit balwani
Thank you for response. So should i submit this proposal? On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, 3:20 AM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > I had a quick look and it seems reasonable. > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 16:11, mohit balwani > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have made a final draft proposal on