Hey, Faisal --
I am willing to join you! It was suggested by Jason in a thread last year
to use and update the existing SymPy tutorial.
Based on the previous SymPy release, I suppose a lot of features can be
added to the tutorial, for example - The Stats and the ODE
modules were extended and
Hello!
I am Anirudh Prabhakaran, and I'm interested in working on the above
mentioned project for GSoC. I have programming experience in Python, and
have learnt about differential equations as a senior at school and a
freshman at college.
In order to do so, are there any pre-requisite tasks
> When reviewing GSOC applications (just speaking for myself - I am not
> the only reviewer) I am most interested in ensuring that we can get
> the best contributors who are capable of making the most valuable
> contributions to important parts of SymPy. What you are proposing here
> is a
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Naveen Saisreenivas Thota
wrote:
>
> > I think you underestimate how much work is involved in really making
> > the implementation robust and complete. Note that it's much better to
> > have a well-tested, complete, efficient implementation of a single
> > algorithm
On 28/03/2021 19:48, 'Aditya Saxena 4-Year B.Tech. Electronics
Engineering' via sympy wrote:
Hi developers,
I am Aditya Saxena, a 2nd year ECE student at IIT BHU. I wish to
contribute to the SymPy community but I am new to SymPy and so to get
a better understanding of it, I was going through
> I think you underestimate how much work is involved in really making
> the implementation robust and complete. Note that it's much better to
> have a well-tested, complete, efficient implementation of a single
> algorithm with nicely organised and documented code than it is to have
> multiple
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 08:13, Naveen Saisreenivas Thota
wrote:
>
> Now that a basic Riccati Solver is done, it wouldn't take more than a week or
> two to merge it in the codebase. I'd like to know what all we plan on doing
> as a GSoC project as that would help me prepare the proposal. Like, is
> That looks nice. It would be easier to comment on the details if it was
a PR.
I didn't make a PR yet since it is a very basic code and more things are to
be changed.
> One comment I have is that if this is all working with rational
> functions it might be better to work with the numerator
