I'm up for that. I'll wipe my vista partition at the weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Tejas Guruswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 December 2008 19:30
To: Dave Williams
Cc: synce-devel
Subject: Re: OpenSUSE SynCE RPM Repository
Dave Williams wrote:
> Well, as I said
From: Adam Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 December 2008 21:50
> To: Dave Williams
> Subject: RE: OpenSUSE SynCE RPM Repository
>
>
> I'm not sure of the parameters, here. Exactly what version of
> kitchensync is in the official OpenSUSE repos? What opensync
: Dave Williams
Subject: RE: OpenSUSE SynCE RPM Repository
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 21:46 +, Dave Williams wrote:
> I tried to do this a while ago (probably a little over a year) but
never
> got anywhere as there was too much to learn for me. With learning RPM
> and the OBS And finally havin
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 19:28 +, Tejas Guruswamy wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > The thing is, KitchenSync is just a front end, like msynctool. There's
> > still, AFAIK, no actual opensync 0.3/0.4 plugin for KDEPIM 4. So if you
> > try to build and use this KitchenSync, you wind up with a
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The thing is, KitchenSync is just a front end, like msynctool. There's
> still, AFAIK, no actual opensync 0.3/0.4 plugin for KDEPIM 4. So if you
> try to build and use this KitchenSync, you wind up with a setup which
> cannot actually sync anything with KDE 4, and you're
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > OK, thanks for the info. Is there any reason to *not* include the
> > samsung patch with the kernel module? That saves me having two different
> > packages. TBH there is no need for me to build packages for anything
> > before openSUSE
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:57 +, Tejas Guruswamy wrote:
> Thanks for the tips Adam!
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I don't see anything missing. I think it's more like kernel versions >=
> > 2.6.24, but my memory is somewhat hazy. I don't think the WM5+ support
> > was in the kernel as far b
Thanks for the tips Adam!
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I don't see anything missing. I think it's more like kernel versions >=
> 2.6.24, but my memory is somewhat hazy. I don't think the WM5+ support
> was in the kernel as far back as 2.6.21, though. I'm pretty sure it was
> merged later than that
O
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 18:39 +, Tejas Guruswamy wrote:
> What I wanted to ask is 1) is there anything I am missing?
> and 2) for usb-rndis-lite am i correct in saying that it should not be
> needed for kernel versions > 2.6.21? except in some cases where it might
> be necessary to apply the "sa
