RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document

2006-11-28 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Just for the records: I am also statisfied with this wording. Rainer -Original Message- From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 6:46 AM To: 'Miao Fuyou'; Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document

RE: [Syslog] Shepherding document for udp-08

2006-11-28 Thread Rainer Gerhards
-Original Message- From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 2:08 AM To: Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Shepherding document for udp-08 Hi, Yes, I/we should correct this. Do we have any information about

Re: Ciphersuites Re: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document

2006-11-28 Thread tom.petch
Original Message - From: Miao Fuyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Rainer Gerhards' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'tom.petch' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:58 AM Subject: RE: Ciphersuites Re: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document Hi, It looks good. I tend to

RE: TLS RFC was Re: [Syslog] Towards closure of syslog-tls issues

2006-11-28 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Tom, -Original Message- From: tom.petch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:18 PM To: Chris Lonvick; Miao Fuyou Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TLS RFC was Re: [Syslog] Towards closure of syslog-tls issues The latest TLS RFC is RFC4346 which is amended by