- Original Message -
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sharon Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Alarm MIB in syslog-protocol
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 200
B.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4268.txt?number=4268
Sharon
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:26 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Alarm MIB in syslog-protocol
Hi Sharon,
It
: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Syslog] Alarm MIB in syslog-protocol
>
> Hi,
>
> In David Harrington's review of syslog-protocol-17
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog
2006 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog] Alarm MIB in syslog-protocol
Hi,
In David Harrington's review of syslog-protocol-17
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01145.html
he asked about the Alarm MIB - Section 6.2.1.1 (from RFC3877). We
discussed this a w
ssage-
From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Syslog] Alarm MIB in syslog-protocol
Hi,
In David Harrington's review of syslog-protocol-17
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01145.htm
Hi,
In David Harrington's review of syslog-protocol-17
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01145.html
he asked about the Alarm MIB - Section 6.2.1.1 (from RFC3877). We
discussed this a while ago and it doesn't seem that there is a good fit
between the historical syslog se
